Nine Posted April 9, 2005 Posted April 9, 2005 You know, SOCOM, the shots your using on your animated signatures is how film makers imply that the woman is to be viewed as an object whose purpose is merely for sex. Note how it starts from a lower part of her body and rises up slowly, accenting everything in slow motion, lastly coming to her face, which is where women are wholly unique. It's a subtle method of degredation. *s*Not complaining. see it everywhere - movies, tv. part of our culture, I suppose. Just thought I'd rammble on while letting you know. heh Quote
SOCOM Posted April 9, 2005 Posted April 9, 2005 You know, SOCOM, the shots your using on your animated signatures is how film makers imply that the woman is to be viewed as an object whose purpose is merely for sex. Note how it starts from a lower part of her body and rises up slowly, accenting everything in slow motion, lastly coming to her face, which is where women are wholly unique. It's a subtle method of degredation. *s* Not complaining. see it everywhere - movies, tv. part of our culture, I suppose. Just thought I'd rammble on while letting you know. heh <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Uh ok thanks for the heads up but actually what i was trying to show is that their bodies are beautiful but the face is their best feature... "Saving the best for last" Plus it was one of the only ones i could find where it showed there body and face :| And if it offends anyone ill change them... Quote
mameha Posted April 9, 2005 Posted April 9, 2005 You know, SOCOM, the shots your using on your animated signatures is how film makers imply that the woman is to be viewed as an object whose purpose is merely for sex. Note how it starts from a lower part of her body and rises up slowly, accenting everything in slow motion, lastly coming to her face, which is where women are wholly unique. It's a subtle method of degredation. *s*Not complaining. see it everywhere - movies, tv. part of our culture, I suppose. Just thought I'd rammble on while letting you know. heh<{POST_SNAPBACK}>Wow..I had observed that but never really thought about it in that way. Quote
Nine Posted April 10, 2005 Posted April 10, 2005 That was just an information rant. *s* Me prattling off. I'm not offended. *s* Quote
Guest quasicartes Posted May 6, 2005 Posted May 6, 2005 Why is there so many broken links here and there?Is it because peopleare using imagerevue, instead of imageshack?http://img29.echo.cx/my.php?image=useimageshack5xg.png Quote
Guest quasicartes Posted May 6, 2005 Posted May 6, 2005 You know, SOCOM, the shots your using on your animated signatures is how film makers imply that the woman is to be viewed as an object whose purpose is merely for sex. Note how it starts from a lower part of her body and rises up slowly, accenting everything in slow motion, lastly coming to her face, which is where women are wholly unique. It's a subtle method of degredation. *s*Not complaining. see it everywhere - movies, tv. part of our culture, I suppose. Just thought I'd rammble on while letting you know. heh<{POST_SNAPBACK}>Nine, are you a multimedia student? Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.