Josephine Skriver

vatras · June 22, 2023

So with @phenobarbies okay: These are the AI uncensored images.

I added a little watermark as requested. Pleas note that this is not some magic that “uncensored” the image or the unreleased original. Its an edit made by an AI that may or may not resemble the original.

It goes without saying, but I don’t want to offend anyone with these pics, especially not Josephine or Cameron. I just personally think that these blurs ruined the overall image. Same for white bars in front of nipples or big white borders on the site of a pic to get the magazine/instagram effect.

In the case of Josephine, nothing was added that we haven't seen before, since her naked bum can be seen by doing a quick google search, so I don’t understand why it was even censored in the first place.

Spoiler

TheDude2k · June 22, 2023

@vatras Since those photos are from IG, I'm guessing they were censored so they wouldn't get flagged by the IG algorithms. That's why I'm thinking if the pics show up on Cameron's website, they will be the uncensored version. Let's hope that comes to fruition. 🙏

Robyc · June 22, 2023

15 hours ago, phenobarbie said:

Using an AI to unblur the images isn't illegal or fake. Unless we get a complaint from the model/photographer I don't particularly care but use your best judgment. Obviously they were not released uncensored, whather that is because they are going to be in a publication at a later date or because Jo has requested they be censored I don't know.

Just clearly mark that they have been modified.

I'm not sure how you can say that. We don't know what's under the blur. Maybe the model is not naked and this is just a trick of the photographer to make us think otherwise. The AI isn't magic; it draws what you tell it to. If the photos are published that way, who are we to say or do otherwise? Because if the line is drawn at what you just said, I can take the photo where she's covered in soap, tell the AI to remove the soap and publish that. It's a big ethical problem, much more complex than your view. Worst-case scenario: the model or photographer gets upset if things like this start circulating on the internet. In the best-case scenario, maybe they'll never post more blurred photos if they don't want to see them retouched with AI on the internet. The thing is, it's not some user's place to decide to post them unblurred with AI.

Robyc · June 22, 2023

2 hours ago, TheDude2k said:

@vatras Since those photos are from IG, I'm guessing they were censored so they wouldn't get flagged by the IG algorithms. That's why I'm thinking if the pics show up on Cameron's website, they will be the uncensored version. Let's hope that comes to fruition. 🙏

We have never seen the censored ones of Kelly Gale with Cameron Hammond, and it's been years now. So I wouldn't hold my breath.