Stranger50 Posted December 3, 2022 Posted December 3, 2022 7 hours ago, cylnz said: Albert Watson, supposedly 1989 WOW. Thanks!😁 Quote
cylnz Posted December 3, 2022 Posted December 3, 2022 For some reason I cannot edit the post above. Supposed above is fake pic. I have posted the real unedited version here Quote
mainly Posted December 3, 2022 Posted December 3, 2022 30 minutes ago, cylnz said: For some reason I cannot edit the post above. Supposed above is fake pic. I have posted the real unedited version here It’s just someone bumped up the contrast. Probably him. He posted it on his Instagram. Not really a fake. . Quote
cylnz Posted December 3, 2022 Posted December 3, 2022 So it would be like when Marco glaviano used a distortion tool to make her boobs bigger. Quote
Stranger50 Posted December 3, 2022 Posted December 3, 2022 3 hours ago, cylnz said: So it would be like when Marco glaviano used a distortion tool to make her boobs bigger. The making clothing sheer thing is an easy and frequently employed manipulation in fakes. Quote
cylnz Posted December 3, 2022 Posted December 3, 2022 yes, there's a whole bunch of folks over on phun who do/used to do what they called 'x-rays". Quote
mainly Posted December 3, 2022 Posted December 3, 2022 5 hours ago, cylnz said: So it would be like when Marco glaviano used a distortion tool to make her boobs bigger. not really. there is fakery done to photos, usually called retouching. but in this case it's just the exposure bumped up a bit. if you take a pic then bump up the expose in lightroom. does that mean its fake? it's called retouching. although ususally they do it to cover stuff up. not the other way around. but that's done in virtually every published fashion photo. legs made slimmer, face, arms made smoother, waist made smaller, skin color changed. but in this case the change may have even been done by the photog himself since he released the brightnened version on his own instagram, and cindy then commented on it herself. even the photo you posted was veery likely retouched. Quote
mainly Posted December 3, 2022 Posted December 3, 2022 2 hours ago, Stranger50 said: The making clothing sheer thing is an easy and frequently employed manipulation in fakes. its not fake. it's just the original photo with the exposure bumped up. he didn't add anything to the pic. the nipple was still visibale before but when the photo is brightened it becomes more visible. of course there is what you might call fakery employed, (called retouching) where they change the look of the entire body, skin made clearer, waist made slimmer, legs made smaller, etc. but thats done by the photogs themselves.(actually they pay retouchers to do it) then published in magazine. this is done on every single photo of models. Quote
ser_franklin Posted December 4, 2022 Posted December 4, 2022 "Les dix plus belles filles du monde...", Madame Figaro France, December 1990 Cindy Crawford, Elle MacPherson, Stephanie Seymour, Naomi Campbell, Tatjana Patitz, Claudia Schiffer, Paulina Porizkova, Elaine Irwin, Christy Turlington & Linda Evangelista by Patrick Demarchelier my scans Quote
ser_franklin Posted December 13, 2022 Posted December 13, 2022 Cindy Crawford for Windsmoor, 1987 my scan Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.