Genevieve Morton

[Balto88]

Why do you need to see what's between her legs anyway? -_-

[cipcione]

5 hours ago, Balto88 said:

Why do you need to see what's between her legs anyway? -_-

believe it or not there are people who enjoy that very much, don't ask me why lol. anyhow i have no problem with implied nude poses, i get a little bummed out when there is a full nude pose and what's between the legs is completely smoothed out, it's very unnatural. also thanks MX1980 for the details!

[wrx21]

just bought the set and it is meh,i'd say that pics for 2017 calendar/Treats are way better,not worth 30$

[Oscarx n]

I absolutely love Genevieve and I just dicovered this. Thank you for making it!.

[Tonchan]

23 hours ago, Balto88 said:

Why do you need to see what's between her legs anyway? -_-

From my point of view, the problem is not the "lack of nudity" itself. The poses might be a problem: as cipcione stated, if she wants to do implied nudity, she should pose accordingly to that; posing in more explicit positions, then blurring the pictures, leads to a questionable result.

But the thing I really don't understand is Genevieve's calendar shoots as they appeared on Treats. If she isn't confortable with exposing her full body, why were those pics uncensored? Either she didn't give her consent to publication (which would be a serious issue) or she did, but that doesn't make sense.

[xr4ti]

18 hours ago, Tonchan said:

From my point of view, the problem is not the "lack of nudity" itself. The poses might be a problem: as cipcione stated, if she wants to do implied nudity, she should pose accordingly to that; posing in more explicit positions, then blurring the pictures, leads to a questionable result.

But the thing I really don't understand is Genevieve's calendar shoots as they appeared on Treats. If she isn't confortable with exposing her full body, why were those pics uncensored? Either she didn't give her consent to publication (which would be a serious issue) or she did, but that doesn't make sense.

Yeah I can't see the point of hiding it either.  With women in tasteful black/white photos there's not much to see, it's not like she's got a dong hanging out.

[Rob S]

Getting away from whether you guys can see her bits or not.....

[kaos]

ig

 

[tread77]

Any ideas what she's been up to lately? Both on her blog and twitter there seem to be vague statements ("Goodbye fear, hello faith!" on twitter) indicating some upcoming change but it seems, vague and sporadic. Is she moving onto another industry?

[xr4ti]

11 hours ago, tread77 said:

Any ideas what she's been up to lately? Both on her blog and twitter there seem to be vague statements ("Goodbye fear, hello faith!" on twitter) indicating some upcoming change but it seems, vague and sporadic. Is she moving onto another industry?

 

Maybe she is getting married and passing on those lovely blonde genes.  She getting up there after all.

[gogo01]

She announced something for the end of the month. A couple of days to see what's up (another black&white 40 picture set?)

[Balto88]

On 9/25/2018 at 9:40 PM, xr4ti said:

 

Maybe she is getting married and passing on those lovely blonde genes.  She getting up there after all.

 

"She is getting up there after all."
 

.... why do comments like these have to be made? x.x

[retnuh]

New content on her website for anybody that's interested in buying it. 

[Chewbaca]

I just bought the pictures ones released today. Do not buy them ,not worth it. Most of the pictures are repetitive. She's just trying to pull off money without any work. I wish I could get a refund. 

[Balto88]

I'm buying them come pay day

[tedy]

30$ is just way too much......

[ASCOTT]

[Rob S]

Only 29 pics this time, the last set was 40 and the first set 31....maybe she's going for quality rather than quantity

[toastking]

I wish she would release color pictures. Also, having (even very small) thumbnails of the pictures contained in the set would help determining if the set meets personal preferences and is therefore worth buying. 30$ is just to much to casually spend for unknown pictures.

[Romanov]

On 10/4/2018 at 4:45 PM, toastking said:

I wish she would release color pictures. Also, having (even very small) thumbnails of the pictures contained in the set would help determining if the set meets personal preferences and is therefore worth buying. 30$ is just to much to casually spend for unknown pictures.

She won't release thumbnails.   Potential buyers would see how similar and tepid many of these pictures are and stay away.  Lots of Cosplayers on Patreon use this same tactic, and it works great for first-time buyers.  It kills repeat business, though.