diorlover Posted April 17, 2007 Posted April 17, 2007 http://www.bryanboy.com/bryanboy_le_supers...opka_.html#more shocked! shes still a beautiful model though. Quote
rouge red Posted April 17, 2007 Posted April 17, 2007 She is for sure. With a big mistake in her past. But also with an amazing body and a beautiful face there. With her face now and her body back then she'd be my number 2 I guess. Quote
Aida Posted April 17, 2007 Posted April 17, 2007 yes, and as one my friend pointed out those are still artistic nude pics (a famous photographer shot those, famous for those pics) Quote
Strawberry BigMac Posted April 17, 2007 Posted April 17, 2007 i dont care what anyone says this girl is truly sick she should not be alowed to model. Quote
.:.ali.:. Posted April 18, 2007 Posted April 18, 2007 i dont care what anyone says this girl is truly sick she should not be alowed to model.I personally think that that would be totally unfair to Snejana if she wouldn't be allowed to model. Heaps of models have had scandals like this but they were never "not allowed" to model. Some models even pose nude for campaigns or whatnot. And the people on these Pornography images are actually models too. And if her career does get affected drastically (which I personally think would not happen), it would be very unfair to her as many models have posed nude as well. And just as Aida said, those are artistic nude pics shot by a famous photographer. It isn't illegal or anything in the fashion business. Quote
PinkVanilla. Posted April 18, 2007 Posted April 18, 2007 i dont care what anyone says this girl is truly sick she should not be alowed to model. That`s discrimination :persuazn: ... Quote
rouge red Posted April 18, 2007 Posted April 18, 2007 i dont care what anyone says this girl is truly sick she should not be alowed to model. I personally think that that would be totally unfair to Snejana if she wouldn't be allowed to model. Heaps of models have had scandals like this but they were never "not allowed" to model. Some models even pose nude for campaigns or whatnot. And the people on these Pornography images are actually models too. And if her career does get affected drastically (which I personally think would not happen), it would be very unfair to her as many models have posed nude as well. And just as Aida said, those are artistic nude pics shot by a famous photographer. It isn't illegal or anything in the fashion business. I don't think Straw wanted to say she shouldn't model b/c of these pics but b/c of the obvious eating disorder (and NO, you cannot say anything against that fact anymore. But I still like her face, as I said before, and if she'd be healthy she'd be a true beauty and not only a shadow of herself) Quote
Taben Posted April 18, 2007 Posted April 18, 2007 yes, and as one my friend pointed out those are still artistic nude pics (a famous photographer shot those, famous for those pics) i'm sorry but these pictures are not artistic or tasteful, it's soft-core porn. and they look really amateur-ish, i doubt a famous photographer shot those unless it's terry richardson or a famous PORN photographer. anyways we should really move ooooooon Quote
rouge red Posted April 18, 2007 Posted April 18, 2007 ^ About Terry And you are right. In all cases. Quote
Sweet rus Posted April 18, 2007 Author Posted April 18, 2007 I know the name of the photographer btw :evil: Quote
peyt Posted April 18, 2007 Posted April 18, 2007 I don't see how these pics should be artistic eiter. If they are I can't imagine how the cheap, porn slutty ones would be.... Anyway, I don't care about them,she is beautiful and amazing so whatever... Maybe like Susanna said if she gaines weight....she will be a goddess Quote
PinkVanilla. Posted April 18, 2007 Posted April 18, 2007 Dammm pictures. if we love snejana we move on ... so: lets D O` I T!!!! <_< Quote
PinkVanilla. Posted April 19, 2007 Posted April 19, 2007 She was so gorgous at balmain ... :wub2: thanks 4 posting the HQ`s persy Quote
Aida Posted April 19, 2007 Posted April 19, 2007 yes, and as one my friend pointed out those are still artistic nude pics (a famous photographer shot those, famous for those pics) i'm sorry but these pictures are not artistic or tasteful, it's soft-core porn. and they look really amateur-ish, i doubt a famous photographer shot those unless it's terry richardson or a famous PORN photographer. anyways we should really move ooooooon haha <_< this is what a friend told me on tfs (i translated it the best i could) 'Anyways, even if it was her, from what can I see she posed naked for Hegre, whose a photographer of naked women less or more 'artistic', it depends on points of view, but certainly not 'porn'; so I wouldn't be making it a big deal...' and here is something else he pointed out: 'one of those covers says 'january 2003' and because she had to be at least 18 when she posed naked (or at least in theory), then maybe that couldn't even be her after all (the same author of the text says that he isn't sure that it's her- similarities sometimes happen!); or maybe Snejana has already 23/24 years?' Quote
.:.ali.:. Posted April 20, 2007 Posted April 20, 2007 Balmain FW07 Thanks to pinnie at tfs she looks so preeetttyyy Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.