[solo] Posted December 12, 2004 Author Posted December 12, 2004 Sorry... didn't know there were these restrictions on "The Booty". I thought it was for pics of nice booties. I guess my definition of "porn" is different than everyone elses.I didn't say the images were actually porn, just they were too close to porn.. they could be called porn-tending images. Basically they are generally: Amateur models, Ugly, Taken by an ameteur photographer who doesn't know sh*t about photography. Those were removed and will be removed if they surface again. Quote
fremont Posted December 12, 2004 Posted December 12, 2004 Michelle Behennah has a distinct derrier: Quote
Nebucadnezar Posted December 13, 2004 Posted December 13, 2004 Random shots:[removed to due sparks comment] Quote
Nebucadnezar Posted December 13, 2004 Posted December 13, 2004 next door nikki[removed to due sparks comment] Quote
Hiro Posted December 13, 2004 Posted December 13, 2004 This thread is a replacement for the previous one which got filled with porn.You may post fine booty here, BUT NO PORNO OR PORNO-TENDING PICS WHATSOEVER. This means NO AMATEUR MODELS. LimaX is not a porn site. Quote
Nebucadnezar Posted December 13, 2004 Posted December 13, 2004 ok I guess all my posted pics need to be removed now according to sparks comment Quote
opepoli Posted December 13, 2004 Posted December 13, 2004 ...Some of the images may have been a little too close to porn...but there was some nice booty. Can I have a moment of silence for the fallen booty... Quote
Nebucadnezar Posted December 13, 2004 Posted December 13, 2004 i guess yeah, thats why i removed them Quote
opepoli Posted December 13, 2004 Posted December 13, 2004 Should start another thread..."Near Porn booty"... Quote
Nebucadnezar Posted December 13, 2004 Posted December 13, 2004 - if the mods would be fine with it? Quote
Guest quasicartes Posted December 13, 2004 Posted December 13, 2004 Sorry... didn't know there were these restrictions on "The Booty". I thought it was for pics of nice booties. I guess my definition of "porn" is different than everyone elses.I didn't say the images were actually porn, just they were too close to porn.. they could be called porn-tending images. Basically they are generally: Amateur models, Ugly, Taken by an ameteur photographer who doesn't know sh*t about photography. Those were removed and will be removed if they surface again.There is anobvious flaw in you definition of porn. You see, noewadays, pornsh*t are done by famous photographers, not amateur snappers. Playboy and many other porn mags uses respectable f=photographers.To cut straight to the chase: My point is only The OFLC's definition of porn is perfect. (Pics which do not contain Adriana must be labelled pornographic). :evil: Quote
opepoli Posted December 13, 2004 Posted December 13, 2004 Should start another thread..."Near Porn booty"... For those with a taste for the classy but a craving for the dirty... how about it? :evil: We promise to play nice... Quote
![[solo]](https://dev.bellazon.com/main/uploads/monthly_2017_01/15369228_10154790875859028_7097145663713056934_o.thumb.jpg.88f1e7a42484802bd1be1456615690fb.jpg)
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.