The Political Correctness Haters' Club

[Sarah.Adams]

6 minutes ago, Cult Icon said:

I guess I should visit my personal library

 

thank you .... I'll wait  

 

6 minutes ago, Cult Icon said:

Apparently you know more about the calories I ingest that I do (the calorie counter).  

I'll leave this uncommented ..... I don't feel bitchy enough to comment on it  

[Cult Icon]

Apparently I consume 2,600 calories a day!  I never knew!

[Sarah.Adams]

1 minute ago, Cult Icon said:

Apparently I consume 2,600 calories a day!  I never knew!

 

or being a 30 plus moron fighting again his own body with a sub-caloric diet trying to get his early 20s body ..........that he'll never get  

[Cult Icon]

I was 180/170 lbs in my early 20s

 

You'll never get punished for bad behavior, woman

[Sarah.Adams]

5 minutes ago, Cult Icon said:

I was 180 lbs in my early 20s

 

I'm sorry that you still carrying this weight  maybe it's time to let it go and loosen a lil .......... but I'm not sorry being a bitch. You attacked me..... I just defended myself 

[Cult Icon]

I lost the weight quite fast (when down to around 145 and stayed there for years)

[Sarah.Adams]

17 minutes ago, Cult Icon said:

You'll never get punished for bad behavior, woman

 

while you are being perfectly nice? 

[Sarah.Adams]

2 minutes ago, Cult Icon said:

I lost the weight quite fast (when down to around 145 and stayed there for years)

 

I didn't mean that you carry it literally ........you might need to read between the lines 

[Cult Icon]

I have no interest in that

[SympathysSilhouette]

14 hours ago, Cult Icon said:

 

You are emphasizing the extreme negatives while ignoring the positives that women enjoy from day to day- pretty standard.   Women are major political constituents for identity politics and it is their interest to advance victimization.  Research results in the US are often slanted towards their backers or whatever is more beneficial for the group.   Chop off the tail end of the distribution and things are more positive.

 

Naturally political incorrect views are accumulated through personal experience and not theoretical presentations.  

 

None of this really disproves the raw data. I mean, those 11K women were still killed and unless you are arguing those 40 million women are all (or mostly) lying that is a horrific statistic. So I don't see how women's collective power could be all that great when over 23% of women in the US have been the victim of physical violence at the hands of a man.

You would think that not being physically harmed would be the top priority in wielding that supposedly massive amount of power.

[jj3]

Protest over “no-go zone for women” in Paris immigrant district.

>> https://www.thelocal.fr/20170519/protest-over-no-go-zone-for-women-in-paris-immigrant-district

 

With Macron or without him, old or new government, the same problems are still there, and nothing is done, EVEN if a woman mayor is in charge in Paris ... Desperating !!

[Cult Icon]

On 5/15/2017 at 6:03 AM, SympathysSilhouette said:

 

None of this really disproves the raw data. I mean, those 11K women were still killed and unless you are arguing those 40 million women are all (or mostly) lying that is a horrific statistic. So I don't see how women's collective power could be all that great when over 23% of women in the US have been the victim of physical violence at the hands of a man.

You would think that not being physically harmed would be the top priority in wielding that supposedly massive amount of power.

 

You disprove nothing.  Your unsourced data is likely from a policy/research group that aims at advancing the interests of women.  I've seen you post links from Huffinton, Salon, NYT, etc, the typical platforms for training SJW's- keen to label and wallow in victimization.  Even the US Gov't is biased towards scientific socialism...there's more Tax dollars to harvest from the big Sell.

 

A portion of the women are certainly lying.  A few incidents physical abuse for years of mooching? Manipulative ploys to gather a portion of the man's wealth?  It's not always 100% fault of the man.  When I was 20 yrs old I got arrested for disorderly conduct and did many hours of anger management.  It was interesting to hear dozens of men's versions of their life stories.  Most of them were middle class men/professionals who had a domestic incident.  It was not clear cut "100%" man's fault. Men have testosterone, which leads to violent behavior if pressured.  Women, when pressured, used indirect weapons such as manipulation, cheating (mating up after their current mate has failed to satisfy them), indirect psychological bullying, lying, and schemes.

 

You seem to not really grasp my focus (the framework of a modern woman's life) and day to day existence.  I focus on superior female social power.  Look at dating sights and agencies and the things that women demand.  The majority of time, they vastly overvalue themselves as individuals and want far more than they deserve.

 

 

[SympathysSilhouette]

There are more men named John among fortune 500 CEOs than there are women. So tell me again how women are so all-powerful.

 

I also don't see the point of a discussion where one side immediately calls all proof against their theorem "lies" or "fake". That means that you are so set in your beliefs that no amount of objective truths would make you budge even an inch, so at that point, I might as well be having a discussion with a brick wall.

[Cult Icon]

3 minutes ago, SympathysSilhouette said:

There are more men named John among fortune 500 CEOs than there are women. So tell me again how women are so all-powerful.

 

I also don't see the point of a discussion where one side immediately calls all proof against their theorem "lies" or "fake". That means that you are so set in your beliefs that no amount of objective truths would make you budge even an inch, so at that point, I might as well be having a discussion with a brick wall.

 

The problem with your response is that you aren't addressing anything that I'm targeting.  You are addressing the typical media focus on corporate, political, and financial power.  plus battery.  

 

Of course I know your position- I read the mainstream media.  You, on the other hand, are ignoring the day to day, boring "mundane" social relations that I wrote about.  It certainly doesn't make a gripping rag article.

[ILUVAdrianaLima]

1 minute ago, Cult Icon said:

 

The problem with your response is that you aren't addressing anything that I'm targeting.  You are addressing the typical media focus on corporate, political, and financial power.  

 

Of course I know your position- I read the mainstream media.

 

Jeezes you are thick man! @SympathysSilhouette don't bother, trust me! 

[frenchkiki]

26 minutes ago, Cult Icon said:

 

You disprove nothing.  Your unsourced data is likely from a policy/research group that aims at advancing the interests of women.  I've seen you post links from Huffinton, Salon, NYT, etc, the typical platforms for training SJW's- keen to label and wallow in victimization.  Even the US Gov't is biased towards scientific socialism...there's more Tax dollars to harvest from the big Sell.

 

A portion of the women are certainly lying.  A few incidents physical abuse for years of mooching? Manipulative ploys to gather a portion of the man's wealth?  It's not always 100% fault of the man.  When I was 20 yrs old I got arrested for disorderly conduct and did many hours of anger management.  It was interesting to hear dozens of men's versions of their life stories.  Most of them were middle class men/professionals who had a domestic incident.  It was not clear cut "100%" man's fault. Men have testosterone, which leads to violent behavior if pressured.  Women, when pressured, used indirect weapons such as manipulation, cheating (mating up after their current mate has failed to satisfy them), indirect psychological bullying, lying, and schemes.

 

You seem to not really grasp my focus (the framework of a modern woman's life) and day to day existence.  I focus on superior female social power.  Look at dating sights and agencies and the things that women demand.  The majority of time, they vastly overvalue themselves as individuals and want far more than they deserve.

 

 

You can't be serious.

[Cult Icon]

7 minutes ago, frenchkiki said:

 

You can't be serious.

 

This is the "politically incorrect" thread, certainly not something floated on "huffington".  

 

It takes only deep observation and experience to see this.  To add, recently one of my friends has been taken the cleaners by his woman- while she is complaining of being a "1950s housewife", he is making 4 times more money than her and she has convinced him to spend hundreds of thousands of dollars of his own savings, accumulated in 15 years of effort.

[ILUVAdrianaLima]

I guess some people really love their "alternative facts"  

[Stromboli1]

When did saying "fucking cocksucker" become a homophobic slur?

 

 

[Limerlight]

From: http://time.com/4793331/instagram-social-media-mental-health/

 

Quote

The government can also help, the report states. It calls for “safe social media use” to be taught during health education in schools, for professionals who work with youth to be trained in digital and social media and for more research to be conducted on the effects of social media on mental health.

Is this really what the next generation may have to learn? How to look at another human's pictures and have a professional to talk about how other's look compared to themselves be it edited or unedited? Or have your teacher saying that this famous person doesn't look like you for whatever reason and that's okay cause you're all special to yourself is fucking stupid