Candice Swanepoel

[ThePinkDiet]

So she's already leaving Brazil? I'm confused. Is she spending the holidays in the States? Or in South Africa maybe?

[Candylicious.]

HQ - Departs From Espirito Santo 12/18/2018

 

[josledes]

Candice leaves Brazil, bound for South Africa maybe?. I love seeing Candice with her beautiful children, Ariel still has little hair but he is getting blond as well as his brother.

[medicenevs]

3 hours ago, ThePinkDiet said:

So she's already leaving Brazil? I'm confused. Is she spending the holidays in the States? Or in South Africa maybe?

She wasn't going to stay, she said in a couple of interviews that she was going to spend the holidays in SA and that she wanted her boys to see the lions.

[Candylicious.]

 

[Candylicious.]

[josledes]

Her mother accompanies her on the trip, they go to South Africa to spend Christmas, sure.

[josledes]

[Candylicious.]

Creepy video.

 

I find it sad she’s being filmed like that in like her personal space. It even felt creepy to watch. Don’t know who filmed it cause it’s with a phone? But they shouldn’t post it on the internet imo.

[CandyArrow]

24 minutes ago, Candylicious. said:

Creepy video.

 

I find it sad she’s being filmed like that in like her personal space. It even felt creepy to watch. Don’t know who filmed it cause it’s with a phone? But they shouldn’t post it on the internet imo.

 

Totally agree @Candylicious.

[Schemer]

1 hour ago, Candylicious. said:

I find it sad she’s being filmed like that in like her personal space.

 

She's in the airport, that's a public place. Not her "personal space".

 

It's no different than any other candid from paparazzi posted here almost every day.

[angelcandicebra]

And all that story that Candice would have done a Vogue "73 Questions" video? I guess it wasn't real after all, right? 

[MissPadilla]

 

Photos via QUEM Acontece.

[MissPadilla]

8 hours ago, angelcandicebra said:

And all that story that Candice would have done a Vogue "73 Questions" video? I guess it wasn't real after all, right? 

 

If she did it Vogue maybe is keeping it for next year but is kind of strange if they do that.

[*Luna*]

11 hours ago, Schemer said:

 

She's in the airport, that's a public place. Not her "personal space".

 

It's no different than any other candid from paparazzi posted here almost every day.

That doesn’t automatically means it’s fun or normal. I doubt you would like to be filmed while you’re checking your luggage or when you’re out and about with your family. 

[Clauds]

43 minutes ago, *Luna* said:

That doesn’t automatically means it’s fun or normal. I doubt you would like to be filmed while you’re checking your luggage or when you’re out and about with your family. 

Pretty much. But apparently some basic respect and decency is not a thing for some people; it's also not even just Candice. It's her entire family, especially her children being filmed that makes the entire thing even worse.

[Schemer]

50 minutes ago, *Luna* said:

That doesn’t automatically means it’s fun or normal. I doubt you would like to be filmed while you’re checking your luggage or when you’re out and about with your family. 

 

As a multimillionaire celebrity that profits from paparazzis, honestly, I wouldn't mind. It's par of the business. Also, Candice isn't exactly hiding her kids from public considering that she shares photos and videos of them on her social media.

 

5 minutes ago, Clauds said:

Pretty much. But apparently some basic respect and decency is not a thing for some people; it's also not even just Candice. It's her entire family, especially her children being filmed that makes the entire thing even worse.

 

If you are so against it and you think it's against basic respect and decency, why do you as a moderator then allow photos of Candice and her family from the airport just three posts above you? And why is this case any different of multiple cases of Candice and her family papped on the random streets all over the world? There is literally zero difference.

 

You guys are acting like someone stuck a camera into her back yard. It's an airport, it's no different than any other public place.

 

[josledes]

Clarify your ideas, it's okay to put a thousand photos of Candice and her children in the airport but a video of exactly the same does not. What happens here?, I'm a pariah in this forum?. If that's the case, I'm leaving, I have no need to take these rebuffs.

[*Luna*]

30 minutes ago, Schemer said:

 

As a multimillionaire celebrity that profits from paparazzis, honestly, I wouldn't mind. It's par of the business. Also, Candice isn't exactly hiding her kids from public considering that she shares photos and videos of them on her social media.

 

So you’re basically saying that just because it’s part of the business it shouldn’t be considered a big deal? I highly doubt you’d like to be followed around 24/7 - I don’t think the idea of lots of paparazzi following you with camera’s in your face while you’re hanging out with family or even just running errands would be something to look forward to. Also Candice sharing pictures of her children on social media is her decision. She gets to choose what she wants to post and what not. Just because she posts pictures of het children doesn’t automatically mean it’s not weird for someone to film her + her kids without them knowing that.

[Clauds]

22 minutes ago, *Luna* said:

So you’re basically saying that just because it’s part of the business it shouldn’t be considered a big deal? I highly doubt you’d like to be followed around 24/7 - I don’t think the idea of lots of paparazzi following you with camera’s in your face while you’re hanging out with family or even just running errands would be something to look forward to. Also Candice sharing pictures of her children on social media is her decision. She gets to choose what she wants to post and what not. Just because she posts pictures of het children doesn’t automatically mean it’s not weird for someone to film her + her kids without them knowing that.

 

This pretty much sums it up  I also doubt Candice is making any profit from this pictures.

 

This same thing happened with the paparazzi that got mad with Martha Hunt because she said she would sue him if he published candids of her undewear, because she's already a lingerie model so she shouldn't be mad at him. People need to have some limits and respect these women's private lives, just because they are public figures it shouldn't make it okay for them to not have some time off from cameras, even if she's at a public place, again, I don't think any of us would be happy with strangers taking our picture while we eat, are at the airport, etc.

 

53 minutes ago, Schemer said:

 

If you are so against it and you think it's against basic respect and decency, why do you as a moderator then allow photos of Candice and her family from the airport just three posts above you? And why is this case any different of multiple cases of Candice and her family papped on the random streets all over the world? There is literally zero difference.

 

You guys are acting like someone stuck a camera into her back yard. It's an airport, it's no different than any other public place.

 

 

Because it's my personal opinion, I am a moderator, not the sole forum owner therefore I don't decide if it's okay to post paparazzi pictures of her children or not. If it was my call to make it wouldn't be allowed to post paparazzi pictures of celeb children, which is a policy that multiple news outlets have adopted already, thankfully. I do however get to express my opinion on the matter which I have already, obviously. It's a thing called democracy ya know.