albatross Posted July 13, 2023 Posted July 13, 2023 Spoiler SaveInsta.App - 3145848359784248169.2023-07-13 06_17_39.mp4 Quote
albatross Posted July 19, 2023 Posted July 19, 2023 Spoiler SaveInsta.App - 3150210672897275844.mp4 Quote
albatross Posted August 30, 2023 Posted August 30, 2023 Spoiler SaveInsta.App - 3179746446635615874.mp4 Quote
albatross Posted September 2, 2023 Posted September 2, 2023 Spoiler ssstik.io_1693643033715.mp4 Quote
albatross Posted September 17, 2023 Posted September 17, 2023 SaveInsta.App - 3193701696312017890_176060483.mp4 Quote
babranski Posted September 23, 2023 Posted September 23, 2023 is there a reason I'm missing that Ella is in the "other females of interest" category and not the fashion models one? Here's a set she did recently that has a little bit of NSFW in it: http://www.ofoliver.co/blog/ella-cervetto-in-the-fog Quote
albatross Posted October 2, 2023 Posted October 2, 2023 Spoiler SaveInsta.App - 3204539960862414332.mp4 Quote
albatross Posted November 2, 2023 Posted November 2, 2023 Spoiler SaveInsta.App - 3227015833079187989.2023-11-02 05_23_04.mp4 Quote
albatross Posted November 27, 2023 Posted November 27, 2023 Monday Swimwear Spoiler SaveInsta.App - 3245284232993348998_176060483.mp4 SaveInsta.App - 3245282303445586326_176060483.mp4 Quote
jri49msstate Posted December 5, 2023 Posted December 5, 2023 On 9/23/2023 at 11:10 AM, babranski said: is there a reason I'm missing that Ella is in the "other females of interest" category and not the fashion models one? Here's a set she did recently that has a little bit of NSFW in it: http://www.ofoliver.co/blog/ella-cervetto-in-the-fog Emily Ratajkowski is currently also “other females of interest” even though she routinely walks runways for iconic fashion brands. It’s a weird website. Quote
Bloodshot Posted December 6, 2023 Posted December 6, 2023 19 hours ago, jri49msstate said: Emily Ratajkowski is currently also “other females of interest” even though she routinely walks runways for iconic fashion brands. It’s a weird website. I agree, Emily's "classification" on this site is very strange, she IS a model. Just because she tries to expand the scope of what she does, mostly unsuccessfully, doesn't negate the fact that she's a model. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.