Boob-to-butt ratio

Have you ever noticed that girls with small breasts very often have a really nice ass? And the other way round, girls with huge boobs usually have a flat butt. I think it must have been God's trick or something... Like, you know, a kind of justice thing - if a girl doesn't have big boobs, she deserves a nice, shapely ass (and the other way round). It seems that there might be something like a boob-to-butt ratio which remains kinda constant throughout the population (similarly to beauty-to-intelligence ratio).

What do you think? Any opinions on this? Has anybody noticed the same thing, or not really?

I think we need visual aids.

I wouldn't say I am "small-busted," however my ass is noticeably bigger in proportion to my bust.

One of my closest friend is pretty close to being flat-chested, but her as is VERY shapely. I cannot post a picture of her b/c she hates taking pictures so I don't have many to post. Even if I did have picts., it would be wrong to post them.

^Not in your case.

:voodoo:

Whoa, now that you've pointed it out, this seems pretty true

hmm visuals. I think you're just looking for an excuse to post Keyra Agustina. She's like the billboard advertisement for girls with small boobs (but with a great ass). Anyway, for all the boys secretly keeping tabs on this thread, I'll set the example for once and who knows, this thread might grow into a another 100 page visual of bums and flat chest appreciation

Anyway, here we go:

Keyra: What can I say? Her ass is better known than her face.

You don't have to be a scientist to see that her ass definitely outmatches her bust in the size department.

Keira Knightley:

One thing I always noticed about Keira is that unlike other lollipop skinny girls, she actually has very "normal" (as in slim-not bony) legs and a bum. That's also the reason why she's not on my too-skinny list. I mean, her bust is as flat as Samantha Ronson's but where sam actually looks like a 10 year old boy on meth, Keira still looks like a woman.

Visual: here's a pic that illustrates this well:

^Not in your case.

:voodoo:

i dont know if this an insult or compliment which makes it funny.

holy moly, keyra, eh?

@ matt, it's an insult...

IT IS?!

What you saying? :persuazn:

That's alright kiddo... you still have a few years to grow some

holy moly, keyra, eh?

Yes. Keyra Augustina. I'm pretty sure she has a babe thread here. If not, I believe I have all available pictures of her plus the videos.

For the clarity's sake, could we establish a threshold for what we would call a bum deficiency or a boob disadvantage?

In the case of Kayra, it is obvious but what about the other way around?

Patty B. has a undesputably blessed bust area however, as nice and shapely her but is, it could be argued either way.

... and of course the exceptions to the rules.

Also, please don't take this as an attempt to pop holes in your theory. I'm just really interested and just want to raise a question...

Whose to say that a woman of a smaller breast size, upon evaluating her situation, decided to work ongetting some meat on her but? Unlike breast size which I believe is totally genetic, you could stimulate hypertrophy in your gluteus maximus causing the muscle to expand and well... in effect make your bum more shapely. Of course, you can also do the same with your pectorals but that mereley proves to provide support for your breasts and not actually make them bigger. However, in Keyra's case, not only does she have above average muscular development in her lower body, but fat distribution favours her with a little more cushion for the pushin as well. That like breast size is also mostly genetic.

I'm not so sure about that one XD Coz I'm rather flat and my butt is also rather flat. maybe im not a good example for that one.

that just might be true

i have very small breasts, but my ass is really nice.

^ prove it!

Brasileiras, they have glorious asses but no tits unless surgically enhanced

that just might be true

but my ass is really nice.

I still think it's very random and not that black and white. Especially when something like genetics (a very random phenomenon) is involved. In certain areas, there are girls that really don't have that good of an ass or breast size. Japan is a good example. But that is okay though. The girls there make up for it by having a super nice physique.

I dunno... I know some Japs that have boobs AND butt. What? What?

Anyway, I've stopped using this imaginary thing people are calling "race" to determine how people will be. Put some Koreans in Africa or some Sri Lankan in Sweden and see what happens to them in a few generations. Like seriously, the only difference is skin color and hair texture which aren't really differences at all if you ask me but even that difference is lost once your "interbreed". A thousand years from now, everyone is gonna look "Filipino" or "Brasilian" and we'll be discussing the differences between Terrans, Martians, and Orion slave girls.

Seriously, racial profiling in the States only works because the party in power (the "Whites") have established a system which opresses minorities and makes the cycle of life for them difficult to change.

Crap... off topic. :|

No seriously, what do we say about Patricia Barros? She definitely has both boobs and butt and Bianca Bauchamp is 100% natural too so what can we say about her?

Obviously there are gonna be exceptions to this rule because what Q is saying is just a generalization. But I think it's a pretty accurate statement. I'm just thinking about a bunch of girls I know and they're usually more stacked in either the ass or the hips. Rarely are they completely flat or completely curvy. So I think it's a pretty interesting observation