35 replies · 8713 views
actually i didn't get what Q wanted to say about Nat ..."fuller"
sry but nat is just for natalia in my mind
well yeah vale is much "fuller" than natasha
natasha with flavia and vlada - snejana are the skinniest
sry but nat is just for natalia in my mind
well yeah vale is much "fuller" than natasha
natasha with flavia and vlada - snejana are the skinniest
yeah blada
they are frigile (or smth similar word)
yeah bladathey are frigile (or smth similar word)
doh i need to work on english
doh i need to work on english
layla, you know i like you much more more than Valentina![]()
seriously Vlantina is very boring in my opinion, she is so not interesting, her expressions are always the same she doesn's show emotions, she is probably my least fave russian model ever.
Ralph Lauren is so good to her, because it is the most boring collections in all over the world, they are for old, conservative women.
Yes, but she's still MUCH prettier than duck-faced Julia Stegner
![]()
![]()
i will Quack you <_<
expierance shows that it has a lot
asymetry rules hahahaha
julia has crooked mouth and her one cheekbone is lower than another one that's why she isn't boring hahahaha and has much much much work not like somebody weee

If this was a poll, I would vote "no." Then I would question the point of creating this thread beyond being a shameless attempt at getting a model more attention.

julia has crooked mouth and her one cheekbone is lower than another one that's why she isn't boring hahahaha and has much much much work not like somebody weee

She's got a very beautiful face.
I did not know her till I ask who the girl on the logo was.

Flawless perfection?
No, her teeth aren't sharp enough in my opinion
.

layla, you know i like you much more more than Valentina![]()
seriously Vlantina is very boring in my opinion, she is so not interesting, her expressions are always the same she doesn's show emotions, she is probably my least fave russian model ever.
Ralph Lauren is so good to her, because it is the most boring collections in all over the world, they are for old, conservative women.
Yes, but she's still MUCH prettier than duck-faced Julia Stegner
![]()
![]()
i will Quack you <_<
![]()
Being a successful model has nothing to do with being pretty--just look at Freja, Sasha, Lily Donaldson, etc. End of the day, Valentina is way more facially prettier than Julia. At least her face is on straight <_< .
are you saying that lily donaldson, in your opinion.. isnt pretty?? !
now im open minded, but thats plain foolishness
and i think that valentina is lovely..she has an amazing sweetness to her face that is captivating and she never comes off as
a 'california blonde' she always seems very european to me... but i agree, layla that sometimes people can be soo perfect <or what we perceive as perfect>
that they almost come off as boring
i had a friend tell me yrs ago that christy t. was soo perfect that she seemed almost plain, if that makes sense o.0

Well, first of all I didn't know this thread will ever get back to top pages here ![]()
And penny, that makes sense.... but I guess in Valentina's case, describing her as a "boring" type has to do with the lack of variety in her portfolio
I believe she just isn't given a chance to present herself and pose differently in every new photoshoot.... sad, cause seriously, I believe the problem isn't in Val being "boring", but in photographers who don't want to picture her in other than "so classically beautiful" way.
And what I meant when I started this thread was.... Just look, Zelyaeva appeals to different people... regardless of age etc.
And well... please, find me just 1 person who can say that Val is terribly ugly
I haven't heard of any. Boring, yes, but ugly? No way.

For something different from some of her usual stuff, I always liked that Lee Broomfield shoot for Vogue Russia with her
.




:morning: