Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince

I can't wait to see it!!!

I have to read the book again before so I can refresh my mind.

We're having a big party at my job when the movie comes out! (I'm a librarian)

i always wanted to work in a library during college I'm cut for that job

OME! Look here!

http://vids.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseacti...ideoID=59840897

I didn't get anything :| who's the bad guy towards the ending?

It's ... oh what's his name.... the one who made Lupin a Werewolve!

Greyback

I saw the movie and I really liked it!

Although, I must point out that I didn't compare it to the book at all. Just watched to enjoy.

the movie was great!

dumbledore, you are the best!!!!!

blah

worst HP movie ever.

To many holes and bad acting on the parts that mattered.

I hate Warner Bros

Still two weeks after watching it I still can't find words to express how much I abhor the movie

I really liked it

The fourth movie was so bad... I'm very happy the fifth and sixth were different to it.

I hate Warner Bros

Still two weeks after watching it I still can't find words to express how much I abhor the movie

I know, I know. I want it redone as well!

I really liked it

The fourth movie was so bad... I'm very happy the fifth and sixth were different to it.

but it was nothing like the book, and I stress this: nothing!

They made it to damn funny and left out everything that really mattered.

exactly they concentrated so much in those parts and idk what happened but Daniel Radcliffe can't act anymore the first and second movie are the best! the others just start getting (N)

Why can't they make the movies like he lord of the rings? or chronicles of narnia? in both cases the movies are so good and exactly as the books

yeah Dan was a HUGE disappointment....most of all in that Dumbledore scene. But he was worse then anyone, I never liked Michael Gambon for Dumbledore.

Good things about the movie:

1. Lavender

2. Slughorn

3. Cormac

4. It was funny. I did laugh alot but laughter does not fix a broken movie.

The first & second were done by Chris Columbus, everything after that was done by some idiot.

I know that's why they;re such a huge difference from the two first ones after I watched the sixth one I immediately turned to the second I miss the old Dumbledore He was a great actor

^Yes, he was. Richard Harris managed to come off as perfectly ancient and wise. He really brought the character of Dumbeldore to life.

I don't bother to compare the books to the movies. The books are always better and that's that. The movies themselves are good, but not when you start to note the similarities or differences to the books. You can ALWAYS find something wrong with them.

I really liked the 6th movie.

Sara, we should not have to comprise the book to bring it to the big screen.

It is doable to stay true to the books....Narnia and Lord of the Rings are proof of this.

If we all become satisfied with the crap they give us...then all we will get is crap and it will get worse and worse.

True like disney lately

^True... Yes, Narnia was very good. The Lord of the Rings was amazing! I own all 3 extended editions.