24447 replies · 16756286 views

19 minutes ago, horus said:
Do you guys really pay any attention to what is posted?
Check @Fakiras post, which says 2013.
I just found it surprising. Why are you overreacting?

2 hours ago, horus said:Do you guys really pay any attention to what is posted?
The exhibition is now, but the pic is old, it isn't uncommon for old pics to be exhibited in an exhibition. And yes, the pic is probably from 2013. In any case, you can clearly see in the pic that Barbara looks quite a bit younger, it's not a pic from at least the last 5 years.
I don't think she ever had long, waist-length hair, so the picture is strange in the first place...

41 minutes ago, Hungarian men said:I don't think she ever had long, waist-length hair, so the picture is strange in the first place...
No she had that kind of hair, she has it in her 2014 Marie Claire Italia shoots.

The picture is from Glamour Hungary March 2011 so she’s technically underage there and they’re using that 😩! She was 17 when that was taken.

Well the artsy.net Website says "Barbara - Budapest, Mai 2013" , so thats all information I could get for the age of the image.
Thanks to "houndofwinter" for the HD Version.

2 hours ago, Fakira said:Well the artsy.net Website says "Barbara - Budapest, Mai 2013" , so thats all information I could get for the age of the image.
Thanks to "houndofwinter" for the HD Version.
That is probably from when they were first shown in a gallery. The photographer's profile has two of the same pictures of Cindy Bruna with two different dates.
Fashion industry man... messed up pieces of garbage.
