2009 SI Swimsuit Issue

Oh I don't care lol.

I am not a freak like that.

Was merely putting my 2 cents in.

As a woman, I find Cintia's body to be almost perfect in my taste - I do not like woman who are to curvaceous or to deathly skinny. I think Cintia is the middle lol.

Please I don't mind when people have their own opinion's I was just stating that Cintia is not as skinny as a lot of models

^ Totally understand! (Y)

It's funny because I used to be such a HF snob, thinking that any girl who wasn't an a catwalk and under 80 pounds wasn't a real model. Then I got into the Supers and then the old SI stuff and it totally blew my mind. I realized how ridiculous and ignorant I was!

Still, there are a lot of HF obsessed people who seem to genuinly think girls like Natasha Poly ( who is a fab model, IMO) have " hot" bodies. It actually makes me wanna barf now!

I hate when they act like snobs towards the VS and SI girls. I just makes me roll my eyes, because they obviously have no clue - regarding reality or the history of modeling! <_<

P.S: this is not directed at anyone in particular. Just a general mind-set of some fashion-lovers today! xXx

Natasha Poly was not always so skinny, and I think she can very hot but lately with the uber blonde hair and the skinny skinny frame that she looks sick.

I am one of those people who does not like VS over much and I don't really care for SI. I would rather see my fav models on HF runways.

But I am getting over it more and more, but I still prefer Cintia doing her strut for HF

^ Exactly. This separation between " commercial" and " HF" is really such new concept in its present form.

In the super days, they did everything. They were versatile.

P.s: Have to say, as a long time TFS'er, I find it really cool and weird to be having this type of convo on the net! lol! I'd have like twelve warnings by now on TFS! Ha ha!

i like a girl who is versatile....a little weird looking...makes the boys come to the yard....and still commercial. I think lucia, cintia and JW have all that....just like in the olden days.

I like Cintia's body type and she is actually not that skinny compared to a lot of fashion models.

I liked Cintia among others.

Eh, it got mixed reviews. But yeah, don't want to hijack the thread, as humor is such a subjective (and off topic) thing.

BTW Amazon VOD has the tv show free, its about 45 mins

BTW Amazon VOD has the tv show free, its about 45 mins

You can't watch it if you aren't in the USA

Thread edited, heated off-topic debate removed .

To side A, when two people express their discomfort over a referrence to a subject that is universally regarded as...sensitive, it is best to simply take the high ground and apologize (instead) whether it was meant maliciously or not .

To side B, I am sorry for your personal experiences and discomfort, but although a tasteless illustration, the comment was meant out of concern for her size/health, not as a joke about you-know-what .

To both sides, this ends here, if there are any further concerns, please message the staff, each other or go to the Chat Thread . Though you may disagree at the moment, I know you are both good people deep down inside and with effort I know you can settle your differences .

your to good for us Joe =)

Time to compile all of the UHQ scans I've done for this magazine. According to the magazine, there are 33 models featured in the issue but they don't tell you that it also includes the "celebrity" sports stars in the issue.

I chose to make scans for the following ladies: BAR REFAELI, HILARY RHODA, CINTIA DICKER, BROOKYLYN DECKER, IRINA SHAYK, and TORI PRAVER. That's 26 full-sized pictures in 35 pages! Let's see YOU try to scan that many hi-res pictures in 2 days!

I will NOT do anymore scans for this issue! If you want to see the rest of the models featured in the magazine that I skipped over (like Anne V, Melissa Haro, Jessica Gomes, etc.), I suggest either buying the magazine or waiting for someone else to scan them. Other than that, click and download away!

VampireHorde, you are my new hero!

Disappointing issue. The girls are attractive but the shots are bland and boring...they lack something. I figured the cover would go to Bar or Brooklyn. Bar has a fantastic body but I find her face a little plain. The cover shot is unimpressive. Bars' head looks too small for her body and the background is just blah. I'm over Danica, the NBA dancers are not interesting and the tennis players are out of place. This is issue is lacking.

My favorite is Cintia...love the red hair.

Thread edited, heated off-topic debate removed .

To side A, when two people express their discomfort over a referrence to a subject that is universally regarded as...sensitive, it is best to simply take the high ground and apologize (instead) whether it was meant maliciously or not .

To side B, I am sorry for your personal experiences and discomfort, but although a tasteless illustration, the comment was meant out of concern for her size/health, not as a joke about you-know-what .

To both sides, this ends here, if there are any further concerns, please message the staff, each other or go to the Chat Thread . Though you may disagree at the moment, I know you are both good people deep down inside and with effort I know you can settle your differences .

Thank so much to you, Joe. You handled that very diplomatically. I really, really appreciate how you did handle it.

The Girls Arrive in Vegas!!

Apparently, some posters have decided not to come back to this forum w/e but if you do, the girls will be on EXTRA tomorrow nite. They showed a great clip from the show tonight.

Apparently, some posters have decided not to come back to this forum w/e but if you do, the girls will be on EXTRA tomorrow nite. They showed a great clip from the show tonight.

Thanks for the info sweetandlow

where are all the pic from the parties and stuff?!?!

One of the things about the print issue is that there are nearly none of these ridiculously high-contrast front-lit shots like this or this or this. I'm just not a fan of excessively angular features and those shots really highlight them, not to mention that they emphasize the cleavage trough usually associated with augmented breasts.

Maybe it's a technological thing: features seem generally smoother and not as sharp in the print issue than on-screen, and I prefer that.

I'd say that the print issue is a nice improvement from the online photos, but I'm questioning the website-as-a-bad-photos-dumping-ground strategy as prudent in the long term, if they want to improve sales. <_<