5076 replies · 753383 views

4

2.6I think it was better how it was in the first round, where we could put them in order instead of giving points to one. Though 3 or 4 in a group might be better than 5.
Mkey, well...sorry...
...But as I explained the change was based on practicality (the plight of a 2-3 year projected time table) rather than upgrading. But as to the number per round, ironically each group had 10 members total so I chose to do 5 per round to give each exactly 2 rounds of an equal number (5), but that's neither here nor there now of course
...
^I thought VS pics weren't allowed![]()
Really?
Then I'd better take them down
But i don't wanna
But i should
I'll wait for Joe to say something
Well, catalogue stuff is at least more obscure than VSFS since in catalogue work they have dozens of pics that are almost identical minus the color of the clothes. But I would have preferred editorials or candids, but the first thing I noticed was the introduction of hair color
. But either way, what's seen cannot be unseen
so...thanks for stopping by anyways
.

I know who that is ![]()
3.8
^Me too. I like her better without her face in shot ![]()
4
2.8
I think I know who she is.

I have no clue who she is ![]()
2.3

2.5

3,5

4.8

4.5

4

Joe, you should put a link to Edita's thread as a well as a full length body/head shot of her
in a post before.. you put up the next round... maybe? ![]()
2

I know who it is too and if memory serves, I gave her a 10 last time out.
So... 5

3.8

2.5

2

2,5
nice booty ![]()

4

4
2 Votes Needed. ~ Post Edited by Joe > Average