Battle of the Bods

I think i love her body...

Yes.. I really do...

I think i'll give her a 10

Really?

Yes! A 10 it is!

shes smokin!

8.7

9.5

9

9 too

Everyone starts off at a base of 5. You subtract or minus based on what you think.

Shapely, toned legs. Length can factor in, though if they're exceptionally well defined it's not as big of a deal. Alessandra has moderatly toned legs, minimum length, but nobby knees. So out of a possible 1.5 she gets's 1.3

Hip to waist to bust ratio is fairly balanced, little bit wider through the hips - 1 out of a possible 1.5

Over all body look, personal preference etc factors in the last 2 points. Some people like smaller girls, others like larger, other's like a specific body part, ie butt, or breasts or legs... She has a more petite frame, not overly curvy. I prefer a bit more of a toned, curvacious frame so 0.9 out of a possible 2

So my score - 5+1.3+1+0.9 = 8.2

Only moderately toned, as-short-as-can-be with knobby-knee legs is a 1.3 out of 1.5? My God, I'd hate to see the pair of legs that would manage to get negative points from you.

Yes, but based on the pictures provided her legs looked minimally knobby and not nearly as short as I know they are. If I were looking at candids the votes would go down substantially, however we're looking at what her alleged best is. As for negative points there are a number of them. Thunder thighs, long shapeless sticks, zero calf definition in relation to the thigh, etc.. etc.. etc..

7

7

8.5

7.4

8.9. She's got something really nice... she doesn't authomatically jump out at me though. It's only on closer inspection she looks great! But then, you know, she looks great

7

Joe, your signature isn't helping the models

Abigail Clancy - 9,5 A really DAMN GOOD body

Alessandra - 8 (She´s pure sexiness though)

7

Joe, your signature isn't helping the models

What do you mean ?

if someone is going to give a 9 and looks at this:

the 9 can become a 7

1 point of gap is too little

Abigail

9

8

7

8.5

8