Nataniele vs Emily

31 replies · 8976 views

J
Jade**
Posts: 2735
#1

17967663lp7.jpg

98788651.jpg

From Miami With Love's avatar
From Miami With Love
Posts: 5395
#2

This is a joke right? Emily x1000.

34xlvkh.jpg

600fullemilydidonato.jpg

guessspringsummer200910.jpg

Clauds's avatar
Clauds
Posts: 25637
#3

This is not even a competition for me, Emily bu millions

.'s avatar
.
Posts: 9686
#4

Emily

Vanessa_gxox's avatar
Vanessa_gxox
Posts: 15374
#5

They're both extremly pretty girls...but its hard to compare as Nataniele is more exotic looking and Emily is a classic beauty....Nataniele is also younger, so we don't know what she's gonna look like when she's as old as emily is right now...

i prefer emily though

a
aacrazysurf11
Posts: 3191
#6

Emily x33333333333333333333333333333333

Jade, you always surprise me with your polls.

Camp Cupcake's avatar
Camp Cupcake
Posts: 10774
#7
They're both extremly pretty girls...but its hard to compare as Nataniele is more exotic looking and Emily is a classic beauty....Nataniele is also younger, so we don't know what she's gonna look like when she's as old as emily is right now...

i prefer emily though

Emily is only 1 year older then Nataniele. Don't get me wrong I think Nataniele is a pretty girl, but she is cute. Emily on the other hand is classically beautiful, sexy, with stunning features.

Emily hands down.

J
Jade**
Posts: 2735
#8
They're both extremly pretty girls...but its hard to compare as Nataniele is more exotic looking and Emily is a classic beauty....Nataniele is also younger, so we don't know what she's gonna look like when she's as old as emily is right now...

i prefer emily though

Emily is only 3 months older than Nataniele, so pretty much they are the same age. both are 19yrs old.

I prefer Nataniele.

J
Jade**
Posts: 2735
#9

Emily x33333333333333333333333333333333

Jade, you always surprise me with your polls.

Really, i do... why?

Camp Cupcake's avatar
Camp Cupcake
Posts: 10774
#10

Wasn't Nataniele born in '92 while Emily was born in '91?

dawson's avatar
dawson
Posts: 3061
#11

Emily x3

J
Jade**
Posts: 2735
#12
Wasn't Nataniele born in '92 while Emily was born in '91?

no she was born in June 2 1991. and emily in February 24 1991

Vanessa_gxox's avatar
Vanessa_gxox
Posts: 15374
#13

ARE YOU SERIOUS?!I THOUGHT NATA WAS 16 Oh myyy...

but she was born in : Nataniele Ribeiro was born 1992 and has already been to Spain, Greece, China, Germany, Portugal, USA and France.

found that in google ^

ahh she looks way younger than emily though!

Just remember, Biden wasn't elected. He was installed's avatar
Just remember, Biden wasn't elected. He was installed
Posts: 59820
#14

According to the Fashion Model Directory & supermodels.nl, she was born in 1992

http://www.fashionmodeldirectory.com/model...aniele_ribiero/

Matching sets are for girls...with cooties!'s avatar
Matching sets are for girls...with cooties!
Posts: 17410
#15

I like Emily, but the "Emily x infinity" and "is this a joke" comments really astound me :| . Other than skin color and the side profile (which favors Nataniele actually) is the biggest actual difference I see .

Vanessa_gxox's avatar
Vanessa_gxox
Posts: 15374
#16

^ wait, Hold up Joe- are you saying they look alike?! or just that they are both the same amount of beautiful?

they both have different colours eyes, emily has fuller lips, different skin tone, different noses..etc.

Matching sets are for girls...with cooties!'s avatar
Matching sets are for girls...with cooties!
Posts: 17410
#17

I'm not saying they look alike as in like sisters, I'm saying feature for feature I'm not seeing this supposed huge casm of beauty .

From Miami With Love's avatar
From Miami With Love
Posts: 5395
#18

Hun, you know I love you.... but they look nothing a like:

post-3451-0-1446062298-10324_thumb.jpg && post-3451-0-1446062300-36038_thumb.jpg

Like.... NOTHING. IMO, they don't even have the same sort of "appeal". I quote appeal because I don't 'get' what's so wonderful about Nat... but that's nothing new, I never get anything!

Vanessa_gxox's avatar
Vanessa_gxox
Posts: 15374
#19

^ hahaha awh. yeh Joe im sorry but they do not look ANYTHING alike...

Matching sets are for girls...with cooties!'s avatar
Matching sets are for girls...with cooties!
Posts: 17410
#20

I didn't say they looked alike :| . And the second time I even said "not alike as in like sisters" :shock: ...In other words I don't see this huge gap in level of beauty others suggest not just overall but not in any individual feature. Of course I don't see the gap in general and preferences aren't a problem for me, but its the huge casm or superiority that baffles me .

but that's nothing new, I never get anything!

Well, we're cursed together in different ways . Because I get appeals of people I don't like but I can't 'get' these 'by fars' and 'by miles and miles' 'no comparisson' ect. in most of these polls .

Page of 2