Rachel Cook
3635 replies · 5316363 views
Katy Perry got a huge backlash when she cut off her hair.
to be honest the hair isnt my biggest issue lately it was the stripper tits that got me
I've slowly gotten used to the short hair, but I still wish she would grow it back of course. The thing that I really don't like is the wrist tattoo. Not only is it unnecessary, it's not even a good tattoo. It's just some basic design that looks like it was pulled straight out of a book or something. If you're going to get a tattoo, at least get a proper one that looks cool or at least means something.
I still think the short hair looks very cute and sexy.
But, considering the amount of photoshoots she has done with wigs, why cut it off if she doesn't feel comfortable appearing with the short do in her shoots?
I wondered that too. I do admire her bravery though, taking a big risk by cutting her hair so short just before launching a new project.
i don't even consider that as short hair, it is buzz cut and it looks terrible on her. she would look very cute with normal short hair though
For a model I would think that the "buzz cut" works out very well. After all, they can change their hair style almost instantly with wigs! You need a blonde? Zip. Need a brunette? Bang right there. not to mention that taking care of all that hair is PITA.
IG Story
Shooting for WVTR
Warning! Nudity
|
|
|
|
3 for the 5,000
I found her out there in a model ig. I didn't mention the photographer who took it. I presume it is
Jared Kocka
1 for the 5,000
46 minutes ago, Modelove said:3 for the 5,000
2 for the 5,000
1 for the 5,000
What the hell does this mean?
11 hours ago, Grievous said:
What the hell does this mean?
How much it will take Modelove to reach 5000 posts
Photos of paparazzzis in Tulum
On 1/6/2020 at 8:08 PM, Smarf said:I'm still fascinated by how many less likes she gets on her photos. I wonder if she's had a drop in followers since cutting her hair off?
She used to get well over 100k likes per photo (sometimes 200k+) and now she hovers between 50k-90k.
I'm almost always one less. Same 'old same 'ole. She's just barraging the 'net with pics. Now it's just quantity, and so many are just censored now it's just a distraction. Sure, some are really showing work behind the scenes gussing her all up, but most are just crudely masked nipples of tits just a little bit overdone with enhancement now. It seems like a huge marketing blast to "pay $15 monthly to see my nipples". Probably along with some other women. The sign-up site isn't even very detailed on what exactly you can expect to see - all past issues, Etc.?
The hair chop job? Meh. She's still pretty, which tells me she not identified by her hair. Kudos to the rest of her body, she's worked out hard to have a body like that (especially her abs/tummy). $15 / month isn't very expensive although it's much higher than other e-zines. But I'd want the full Monty then, not just month after month of pretty much the same regurgitation of overstuffed tits. I'd bet right now if there's a $12 / month as is, and $20 / month and she shows it all, the $20 would swiftly outnumber and sales would leap.