Irina Shayk

We 've seen Adriana lima's breast again, incredible ! But Irina has a serious problem with nudity , her shooting is horrible and unatural !

8 hours ago, Playboyuniverse said:

We 've seen Adriana lima's breast again, incredible ! But Irina has a serious problem with nudity , her shooting is horrible and unatural !

What problem does she have?

NYC stroll with mother Olga

11 hours ago, Light72B said:

 

What problem does she have?

She never pose nude , she doesn't show anything , I think she has afraid to be nude in front of photographer !

19 minutes ago, Playboyuniverse said:

 

She never pose nude , she doesn't show anything , I think she has afraid to be nude in front of photographer !

What's the problem about this? 🤦‍♀️🤦‍♀️🤦‍♀️

13 hours ago, Playboyuniverse said:

 

She never pose nude , she doesn't show anything , I think she has afraid to be nude in front of photographer !

And? She shows what she wants when she wants, it's her body.

the new excuse for detaching from the new puritanism, the truth that people don't understand is that models earn their money thanks to their bodies they are models, neither actresses nor singers ..., many singers are less prude than the models that are paid for it, so the question what are the models for these days because they are afraid of their nudity on pretty pictures!

Solution, get a close friend or family member to take photos, If she has a problem with a professional photographer.

really funny !

Yes, they are models, but they are also humans beings that can do whatever the f*ck they want. It's not even about being a prude...it's just not wanting to pose nude. Irina was doing SI which is super sexual as well. If that is her limit, or any model's limit, then so be it. I'm actually glad Irina has the power now to say NO to certain jobs if she feels like that's not what she wants to do. Whether that is nudity or something else. 

I mean, if that's a problem... what I find more problematic is going to Romee's thread the other day and reading how someone (can't be bothered looking at their name) was glad to have finally seen her nipples. Which is also one of the main reasons why I no longer check Barbara Palvin's thread. 

7 hours ago, Playboyuniverse said:

 

the new excuse for detaching from the new puritanism, the truth that people don't understand is that models earn their money thanks to their bodies they are models, neither actresses nor singers ..., many singers are less prude than the models that are paid for it, so the question what are the models for these days because they are afraid of their nudity on pretty pictures!

Models are paid to model clothes, jewelry, make-up, fragrances, etc. You are not entitled to nude pictures from every model just because others are comfortable with it and shaming models who have made it abundantly clear that they will not pose nude is straight up toxic. Don't like that they don't pose nude? Go elsewhere. Don't come into their thread spouting this nonsense time and time again.

I think there is some misunderstanding. The way I understand modeling job, it is SELLING cloths, products etc. Not SHOWING nudity. I believe if editors or photographers wodnt be happy with her not showing her breast, they would take different model. Simple as that. 

Irina or any other model is free to decide to show whatever and as much as she wants. 

Wrong ! an actress , a personnality or a singer can be selling clothes , jewelry, make-up, fragrances ... A model is a model , the modeling job and her talent is to be a body for anything ... They are chosing for their beauty and their bodys , Nudity has been part of model model work it is related to the body and the opposite the hypocritical puritanism that refuses to see the truth about this work very well paid !

2 hours ago, feyre said:

Yes, they are models, but they are also humans beings that can do whatever the f*ck they want. It's not even about being a prude...it's just not wanting to pose nude. Irina was doing SI which is super sexual as well. If that is her limit, or any model's limit, then so be it. I'm actually glad Irina has the power now to say NO to certain jobs if she feels like that's not what she wants to do. Whether that is nudity or something else. 

I mean, if that's a problem... what I find more problematic is going to Romee's thread the other day and reading how someone (can't be bothered looking at their name) was glad to have finally seen her nipples. Which is also one of the main reasons why I no longer check Barbara Palvin's thread. 

Yeah sexual , as you said , I don't want sexual it's vulgar , again, I like natural and art !

Okay everyone, stop with the same old nudity chit chat, it's Irina's body and she gets to decide what she shows and what she doesn't. We don't need to have same discussion a thousand times in a hundred different threads.

 with her mother and daughter Lea in New York