2014 SI Swimsuit
4178 replies · 1059957 views
I've said all along, why are you putting stock into voting? The rookie has already been picked
Your votes mean nothing except to the advertiser. RAM Trucks
Can I haz RAM truck Pretty?
I'll ram your truck bb®
After EmRata.
Nevermind..
I'll ram your truck bb®
You pay for rear end damage though!
I'll ram your truck bb®
You pay for rear end damage though!
Switch the "c" with an "n"....So wrong! 
I don't know why people dislike Samantha Hoopes? I for one actually think she's total package. Boobs, nice ass, and curves all in the right places 
I don't know why people dislike Samantha Hoopes? I for one actually think she's total package. Boobs, nice ass, and curves all in the right places
In comparison to everyone else she's about as exciting as watching grass grow 
The disclaimer that appeared when I voted (for Marloes..) actually encouraged repeated voting and claimed that they count all the votes, even if they were from a single source.
This means that there is nothing stopping someone from, say, voting ten thousand times with a computer generated macro.
i'm just making assumptions. i think it's fairly clear that the percentages aren't cumulative--there's no way they'd be moving around as much as we've seen. emrata went from 21% after 9 days of voting to 13% on the 10th day. there's virtually no way that happens in a cumulative vote. so i'm assuming that they're over the last 24 to maybe 96 hours. that part is hard to tell.
and yeah, we also don't know how many votes are being cast on each day, but i made some assumptions about that, too, once again using google trends to gauge interest over time.
The thing is, even macro-voting doesn't explain the weird swings in totals.
You can assume that computer-aided massive voting is happening for nearly all candidates.
The one time I followed the voting closely, it quickly became clear that there were totally random shifts at work that could not be explained by any voting pattern, technology-assisted or not.
Rigged, rigged...rigged!
Can we just bring out Molly now?
'MUERICA!Your votes mean nothing except to the advertiser. RAM Trucks
No, no and no - she has none of those things. She looks best from the side, when much of this is masked.. and leave your top on pleaseI don't know why people dislike Samantha Hoopes? I for one actually think she's total package. Boobs, nice ass, and curves all in the right places
Plus, dat face..
I like Samantha Hoopes' look as well.
You just described everything that involves models
This thread just made my Friday even funnier.
'MUERICA!Your votes mean nothing except to the advertiser. RAM Trucks
No, no and no - she has none of those things. She looks best from the side, when much of this is masked.. and leave your top on pleaseI don't know why people dislike Samantha Hoopes? I for one actually think she's total package. Boobs, nice ass, and curves all in the right places
Plus, dat face..
donny, your Samantha crusade is almost endearing 
everybody seek shelter, i see a warnstorm on the horizon!
This is a crazy day indeed 
Rigged, rigged...rigged!
Can we just bring out Molly now?
Did you.... did you just say... Molly?
ヽ༼ຈل͜ຈ༽ﾉ† By the power of donger I summon MOLLY †ヽ༼ຈل͜ຈ༽ﾉ†
'MUERICA!Your votes mean nothing except to the advertiser. RAM Trucks
MUERICA!
Why is Russia on our side of the sandbox? Ain't nobody said you could come this close Mister Putin. Please keep your infestation to yourselves. Thanks
I don't know why people dislike Samantha Hoopes? I for one actually think she's total package. Boobs, nice ass, and curves all in the right places
In comparison to everyone else she's about as exciting as watching grass grow
As exciting as watching grass grow? Surely you jest...
I'd say this ^ is pretty exciting 
The people ask, and I answer :morning:
Lily who had less than 1% is now above 6.64% and Hoopes has fallen to 7.16% and Cris Urena up to 12.76%. Hannah has seen a massive rise to 21.14%. These percentages are all over the place today.