Anastasiya Scheglova

I remember tumblr limiting upload size and downsizing every single image that has been uploaded prior to their update, maybe 500px did something similar and 2000 pixel is now the maximum width. 

3 hours ago, neurovibe said:

UPDATE:
No longer need to do that "right click" and selection source, just do view source. Ctrl+F this: og:image
The 1st one (at least for now) is a meta tag containing that same URL. So meanwhile we have that I guess

That works on non nude posts but not on nudes

23 minutes ago, wndmkr said:

That works on non nude posts but not on nudes

Hm. And you're signed in? 

That sucks.

BTW, it's a shame I can't work on this right now, but if ever anyone of you guys or a guest reading this knows how to code, the json format file called which contains the URL (including for nudes, I tested) is sent through the http requests, so that's a good place to start

Ph.: Grégory Fountoussov • for: Couture de Nuit • Date: Posted July 19 2019 • Source: their IG  • Res.: 1080

It seems like 500px now checks your screen resolution and sends you an image which is a little larger than your Monitor resolution, resized in realtime. Did anyone check the "new" 500px already with a 4k (3.840 x 2.160 pixels) Monitor or with a virtual Desktop at that size? With my Monitor at 1280 x 1024 I get a max. image resolution of 1500 x 1000 with that "test-image" (I wasn't logged in). Imagus at Opera still works, but as the pages are no more static, it can only provide that 1500 x 1000 pixels. 

This change can reduce their traffic by approx. 20-30% which should be the reason why they did this change.

46 minutes ago, LoganJ said:

It seems like 500px now checks your screen resolution and sends you an image which is a little larger than your Monitor resolution, resized in realtime. Did anyone check the "new" 500px already with a 4k (3.840 x 2.160 pixels) Monitor or with a virtual Desktop at that size? With my Monitor at 1280 x 1024 I get a max. image resolution of 1500 x 1000 with that "test-image" (I wasn't logged in). Imagus at Opera still works, but as the pages are no more static, it can only provide that 1500 x 1000 pixels. 

This change can reduce their traffic by approx. 20-30% which should be the reason why they did this change.

Hm, interesting, I'll try that out. Unfortunately I'll have to spoof the res', only my tv is 4k. 

p.s.: I think you meant reduce bandwidth, but yah, sounds logical

10 minutes ago, neurovibe said:

 

Hm, interesting, I'll try that out. Unfortunately I'll have to spoof the res', only my tv is 4k. 

p.s.: I think you meant reduce bandwidth, but yah, sounds logical

You can connect your computer and your TV by HDMI and thus use your TV for testing (as a second Monitor - open the Browser on the TV screen).

Bandwidth is the speed and the amount of data the server can send within one second and is divided by the number of active users on the site. Traffic is the amount of data which is sent within a specific time. As the file-size is reduced, the traffic will be reduced and with the same Bandwidth as before, more users can get served at the same time. On the other hand, the short lag of realtime resizing is partly compensated by faster loading (less data) for users with lower screen resolution.

38 minutes ago, LoganJ said:

 

You can connect your computer and your TV by HDMI and thus use your TV for testing (as a second Monitor - open the Browser on the TV screen).

 

Bandwidth is the speed and the amount of data the server can send within one second and is divided by the number of active users on the site. Traffic is the amount of data which is sent within a specific time. As the file-size is reduced, the traffic will be reduced and with the same Bandwidth as before, more users can get served at the same time. On the other hand, the short lag of realtime resizing is partly compensated by faster loading (less data) for users with lower screen resolution.

Good idea, for the TV via HDMI.

I don't know if bandwidth is the correct term I used since yes, I know bandwidth (in all other senses and in home connections) is the amount per X time, such as volts vs amperage. I forget the word or maybe I used that word, every time I've coded websites or backends on servers, the hosting said bandwidth (or another word that I forget) as amount of data that can be served over a monthly invoice, thus my (maybe) confusion. I somehow always attributed traffic as unique users, maybe I was wrong. My reasoning, which I never apparently questioned post-2000's, was that the more unique visitors, the more bandwidth used. Well well

Meanwhile on IG:
Ph.: n/a • Date: posted early July 2019 • Source: their IG • Res.: 1350px

Ph.: Mikhail Kabochkin   Date: posted Jul.  2019   Source: his IG   Res.: 1080px

Ph.: Rudiger Linden (Germany) • Date: Uploaded Jul 15, 2019 • Source: his 500px • Res.: 1000px

Ph.: Grégory Fountoussov • for: Couture de Nuit • Date: Posted July 22 2019 • Source: their IG  • Res.: 1080

PH: Kseniya Vetrova  Date: Posted July 22 2019 Source: Her IG Res': 1080

Ph.: Frederic Wojcik • Date: posted July 23,2019  • Source: his IG • Res'.: 1080px

PH: Unknown Source: yes no maybe store Res': 2348px

@wndmkr Cool, thanks! 

Ph.: Markus Huber • Date: ? • Source: his 500px • Res.: 900