I approved of the brunette. I hope she returns!  

they should be rookies instead of Danielle and Myla

Lais wins or I will spill the blood of the innocent!

YouTube video:

Christie Brinkley, 63, Is Back In Her Bikini With Her Daughters | Sports Illustrated Swimsuit

old

Meh

is not new

@Prettyphile Did you know about the Christie Brinkley shoot beforehand?

@Sanni

The missile knows where it is at all times. It knows this because it knows where it isn't, by subtracting where it is, from where it isn't, or where it isn't, from where it is, whichever is greater, it obtains a difference, or deviation. The guidance sub-system uses deviations to generate corrective commands to drive the missile from a position where it is, to a position where it isn't, and arriving at a position where it wasn't, it now is. Consequently, the position where it is, is now the position that it wasn't, and it follows that the position where it was, is now the position that it isn't. In the event of the position that it is in is not the position that it wasn't, the system has required a variation. The variation being the difference between where the missile is, and where it wasn't. If variation is considered to be a significant factor, it too, may be corrected by the GEA. However, the missile must also know where it was. The missile guidance computance scenario works as follows: Because a variation has modified some of the information the missile has obtained, it is not sure just where it is, however it is sure where it isn't, within reason, and it knows where it was. It now subracts where it should be, from where it wasn't, or vice versa. By differentiating this from the algebraic sum og where it shouldn't be, and where it was. It is able to obtain a deviation, and a variation, which is called "air"

Do I?

37 minutes ago, Prettyphile said:

@Sanni

The missile knows where it is at all times. It knows this because it knows where it isn't, by subtracting where it is, from where it isn't, or where it isn't, from where it is, whichever is greater, it obtains a difference, or deviation. The guidance sub-system uses deviations to generate corrective commands to drive the missile from a position where it is, to a position where it isn't, and arriving at a position where it wasn't, it now is. Consequently, the position where it is, is now the position that it wasn't, and it follows that the position where it was, is now the position that it isn't. In the event of the position that it is in is not the position that it wasn't, the system has required a variation. The variation being the difference between where the missile is, and where it wasn't. If variation is considered to be a significant factor, it too, may be corrected by the GEA. However, the missile must also know where it was. The missile guidance computance scenario works as follows: Because a variation has modified some of the information the missile has obtained, it is not sure just where it is, however it is sure where it isn't, within reason, and it knows where it was. It now subracts where it should be, from where it wasn't, or vice versa. By differentiating this from the algebraic sum og where it shouldn't be, and where it was. It is able to obtain a deviation, and a variation, which is called "air"

 

Do I?

This looks like a transcript of [insert any politician name here...Bill Clinton will do] testifying under oath! 

LMAO!

11 hours ago, Light72B said:

 

 

Cover conversation: Diva or not, Kate Upton would be the best cover they've had in years. I'm still miffed about the ridiculous Ashley Graham choice, which made the cover absolutely meaningless to everyone. As soon as I saw Christie Brinkley, I immediately assumed she got a (or the) cover, just so SI would get publicity that a 63 year old body can still get the cover. At least Christie is hot...Ashley is NOT. Serena...well, it IS Sports Illustrated, but there are much hotter athletes that would be better for the cover. Remember when the cover was the most beautiful model/photo and not a left-wing political statement? That was awesome. Then...

Christie and her daughters: They're all hot! I'm very impressed, and all three are hotter than four of the rookies.

Now, where is that damn Babs video!?

44 minutes ago, dcjam said:

 

This looks like a transcript of [insert any politician name here...Bill Clinton will do] testifying under oath! 

 

LMAO!

This is a great quote.  it's really great. I mean, the best quote you'll ever see.  It will be great, trust me- Donald J. Trump

7 hours ago, frenchkiki said:

The brunette daughter got a crazy hot body!

I agree, but she looks too much like Billy and that creeps me out.

The daughters are hot enough to be rookies on their own right, I'd be more than fine with both of them staying in the roster.

Also Christie's body makes me sad, I'm in my 20s and don't look like that  

5 minutes ago, Stromboli1 said:

 

I agree, but she looks too much like Billy and that creeps me out.

 

She looks like she is from Middle East countries or even Israel.

And as I like these kind of beauty, she is a "oui, oui" in my book of "oui oui"

Are we sure her mom is her mom?

Can't wait for Cindy Crawford to pose with Kaia when she will be old enough for SI

who's billy?

Kiki your set 

1 minute ago, Cult Icon said:

who's billy?

 

Kiki your set 

Billy Joel, her father