4360 replies · 494067 views

1 hour ago, SuperG.Girl said:Don't listen to this guy. You don't have to fix yourself. It's not your fault ........ it's @Stormbringer 's fault
![]()
Don't listen to the traitor
It's obviously @SuperG.Girl's fault
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()


I finished listening to this audiobook over the weekend:
Everything she says is correct to me, and also (mostly) politically incorrect. I find it interesting as a public intellectual, she must claim to have a "gender neutral" stance when the contents of her talks and 2 books are anything but. She knows evolutionary psychology but will not admit this in her writings, which are completely inline with the sharp differences between male and female psychology. Like the rest of popular media on relationships, the subtext is very biased towards the primal needs of women and makes little inclination to encourage them into taking responsibility for the quality of their thinking and desires . She does not criticize the female emotional spectrum (*which evolved tens of thousands of years ago and lacks relevance in modern life, and imposes enormous costs to men and society). The man is still, as always, a draft horse that has to continuously expend resources/seduce the woman in a long term relationship. He has to "man up" while the woman gets a free ride and is responsible for most breakups and 82% of divorce filings. The women has comparably little to contribute to the man's happiness and the prosperity of herself and her children is primary.
She has some parts where she gives women some responsibility for being attractive (such as keeping down their weight) to disinterested/cheating men but she conveniently doesn't mention that these are higher value, attractive men. Average and below average men will not often not find themselves in this situation. She has decades of experience counseling in NYC and it's largely with upper class and upper-middle class couples and not the uneducated, middle class, and poor.
This book is funny and interesting.
Here are his 38 stratagems:
The Extension (Dana's Law)
The Homonymy
Generalize Your Opponent's Specific Statements
Conceal Your Game
False Propositions
Postulate What Has to Be Proved
Yield Admissions Through Questions
Make Your Opponent Angry
Questions in Detouring Order
Take Advantage of the Nay-Sayer
Generalize Admissions of Specific Cases
Choose Metaphors Favourable to Your Proposition
Agree to Reject the Counter-Proposition
Claim Victory Despite Defeat
Use Seemingly Absurd Propositions
Arguments Ad Hominem
Defense Through Subtle Distinction
Interrupt, Break, Divert the Dispute
Generalize the Matter, Then Argue Against it
Draw Conclusions Yourself
Meet Him With a Counter-Argument as Bad as His
Petitio principii
Make Him Exaggerate His Statement
State a False Syllogism
Find One Instance to the Contrary
Turn the Tables
Anger Indicates a Weak Point
Persuade the Audience, Not the Opponent
Diversion
Appeal to Authority Rather Than Reason
This Is Beyond Me
Put His Thesis into Some Odious Category
It Applies in Theory, but Not in Practice
Don't Let Him Off the Hook
Will Is More Effective Than Insight
Bewilder Your opponent by Mere Bombast
A Faulty Proof Refutes His Whole Position
Become Personal, Insulting, Rude (argumentum ad personam)
But sometimes, I feel like stratagem #38 is by far the most used in our media...
Become Personal, Insulting, Rude (argumentum ad personam)
You don't like the ideas of someone? Just call him the right hand of the devil or the grandson of Hitler, and victory is assured... ![]()
Wonderful ![]()


Yes ^^

This emoticon annoys me:
![]()
Makes no sense at all/ nonsense
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
What is this supposed to mean? Extra super duper excited? Never matches what was written.
![]()
This one is bad too- I call it the "coward" emoticon. Generally used to soften the impact of a statement.
![]()
Beating a 'dead horse' is much better than this one. Another "coward" emoticon that's always misused
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
One is enough, why use 3-4 of them? Rarely matches the impact of what was written.

![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()

1 minute ago, Stormbringer said:
![]()
and the machinegun one- does nothing but slow down access if you're using a mobile phone!

![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()

Also, the use of
at the end of a witticism- it seems almost like an insecurity. It's saying: " I don't know if what I'm writing is funny, but if I use
, in the manner of laugh track for an unfunny TV show, I can now hedge my bets...you'll have to laugh due to peer pressure now"
I have a bad habit of doing this from time to time.

Ed Harris' bad joke!

2 hours ago, Cult Icon said:This emoticon annoys me:
Makes no sense at all/ nonsense
Being that awesome .....it doesn't have to make sense ![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()

guys who use makeup are sissies?
............ plus deep down they wish they were girls? ![]()

1 hour ago, SuperG.Girl said:
Being that awesome .....it doesn't have to make sense
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()

47 minutes ago, Stormbringer said:
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()

is simply used to show ridicule and contempt for the other poster and belittle their opinions around here. Multiple ![]()
![]()
to really emphasize the point.

I don't like processed meat and salads with a mayo base


Is LAIS RIBERIO A DIVA???????????????????

Martha Hunt's face is wrinkling far too much for her age

The Harry and MArkle wedding is BORING!