3352 replies · 6592020 views
I mean older than she normally looks.She looks in her early 20s most of the time but she looks in her mid thirties in that one.
On 9/29/2021 at 3:06 AM, Grievous said:In her 30's is really old??

I have never once seen a picture where Nicola looks even remotely close to mid thirties!
1 hour ago, model619 said:
The second photo where she looks "early 20's" has quite a bit of makeup on, different lighting and surely has been edited a bit.
Left one is more natural with a lot less makeup and her skin looks great as of a 21-23 year old girl.
Right one is definitely edited and never something you would see in real life.
Have you seen 28 year old (good looking with a nice skin) women? You will be negatively surprised if you think left is not good enough.
I am not even going to comment on the 35+ as I am sorry but it is a ridiculous claim.
5 hours ago, model619 said:
Bro what the fuck are you talking about
have you ever been in a dimly lit room before
I found her birthday is December 17, 1998. She is 22.
I have no idea why anyone would think she is any older than that. ??????
This obsession with age is just weird. She's beautiful. Isn't that enough?
It was fun while it lasted actually seeing content on this thread... instead of people talking about random ish that no one really cares about.
She's beautiful, but I'd prefer to watch he doing yoga in Josephine Skriver's top...

@Doedel Thank you for the adds.
Sweet Jesus.

I'm constantly amazed how hot she is

NewYorker
Underwear
< SNIP >
Don't promote outside links to download images. We have no to protect our members from things they may be downloading that could be illegal or do harm to their PC's