1091 replies · 1001781 views
Thanks CAHA!
i found this image in my folder, next to the one caha posted.
its a smaller version with almost the same name.
s0704090g107501417x5213kn2.jpg
S0704090_G107_501.jpg
i dont know on wich site or server he found those originals, but supposing its just a matter of filename maybe you can sneak in the server to find more HD pics
.
If ever all the pics are from the same place or if you can identify the url of the HD ones, replacing the small link by the HD link blah blah blah, you understood .
maybe you can find bigger version of pics below
. they seems to be related.
caha, you are cleaver you already got what i mean
just to explain
http://w00t.piclink.com/s0704090g107501417x5213kn2.jpg for the small version
and
http://w00t.piclink.com/S0704090_G107_501.jpg for the HD. with s0704090 (space before letter) g107 space 501 417x5213kn2.jpg standing for the dimensions and the rest can be deleted.
or another exemple.
s0734015g107501417x5213qj8.jpg
would become
s0734015_g107_501.jpg
thanks a lot and may the force be with you ![]()

The best si cover
Rebecca Romjin vs. Yamila Diaz-Rahi
vote here

thanks zecle ![]()

Yummy swimwear Yamilla !

![]()


wow
Thanks ![]()

Just one question. Are these new photos of Yamila?
i confirm they are !! thanks caha !!!! ![]()
sad you didnt find more of them. maybe somewhere else... who knows.
does someone know how to get the picture link from zoomoviewer ?
because its where the HQ material is !
i tried to read the source code, javascript and swf but found nothing.
i made some screencaps of some pics then i assembled them as a scientist would do with some hubble pictures, but its not a solution, since it takes at least 20 minutes to finish one pic.

As a benefactor of your hard work, Zecle, I thank you!
Yes, thanks Zecle.
But...from looking through the SI site, it looks like Yamila isn't in this years SI issue.
Y?
without mentioning some of the other models, how could they have those in the issue but not Yamila??? :lost: