4385 replies · 525991 views

Natasha
![]()
I LOVE THAT BAG !
I think both ads are crap
but I'll go with Natasha ![]()

:persuazn: ![]()
![]()

The hair in both ads needs to go.....Big hair scares me.. it's just not right.. Maybe in the 70's/80's...... but no!, however I do like Nat's bag better... but the rest is just meh...
ALE is it!!!! /love
Alessandra

The hair in both ads needs to go.....Big hair scares me.. it's just not right.. Maybe in the 70's/80's...... but no!, however I do like Nat's bag better... but the rest is just meh...ALE is it!!!! /love
![]()
Natasha ![]()

Alessandra!!!!!
those XOXO adds were just GORGEOUS!!! sexy, beautiful, have you seen more of them?? AWESOME
and I love the way she looked there!! :love:

Natasha by Far.
I think she looks gorgeous in those jimmy choo ads whereas Ale looks bleh on half her XOXO ads, and the one submitted is definitely a bleh one
plus her ad just consists in an average bag, hold in an average pose by a girl wearing average clothes and in front of a... white wall

![]()
OMG Ben u made me laugh so hard...but that's a good one...i thought it was only me who noticed the intensity of Natasha's ad.
so fierce...

Natasha Poly ![]()

Natasha by Far.I think she looks gorgeous in those jimmy choo ads whereas Ale looks bleh on half her XOXO ads, and the one submitted is definitely a bleh one
plus her ad just consists in an average bag, hold in an average pose by a girl wearing average clothes and in front of a... white wall
sorry but eventhough Ale´s add is simple, it´s so silly calling it "bleh" because it´s still beautiful.... for me, Natasha´s add is out of contest...that bag totally doesn´t suit in the picture, not talking about nothing "fierce" here....the whole add is just..weird. It´s pretty, because SHE is a beautiful model but I don´t like the idea at all, and the quallity od picture too - dunno if it´s supposed to look like that
and I really don´t like the pose... ![]()
sorry, just...makin myself clear... ![]()

Natasha by Far.
I think she looks gorgeous in those jimmy choo ads whereas Ale looks bleh on half her XOXO ads, and the one submitted is definitely a bleh one
plus her ad just consists in an average bag, hold in an average pose by a girl wearing average clothes and in front of a... white wall
![]()
sorry but eventhough Ale´s add is simple, it´s so silly calling it "bleh" because it´s still beautiful.... for me, Natasha´s add is out of contest...that bag totally doesn´t suit in the picture, not talking about nothing "fierce" here....the whole add is just..weird. It´s pretty, because SHE is a beautiful model but I don´t like the idea at all, and the quallity od picture too - dunno if it´s supposed to look like that
and I really don´t like the pose...
sorry, just...makin myself clear...
why is it silly ? i don't like that ad and i don't think ale looks good in it so yeah, it's bleh for me... not to mention the cheesy "kisses and hugs" line ![]()

well I love Ale,but I think that ad is really not so great...so I vote Natasha ![]()
Ale of course
Natasha

i really don't like those ads and those hair <_<
but i have to go with Natasha.

natasha, her ad is maybe somewhat outrageous but at least it's INTERESTING and eye catching. unlike ale's, it doen't even look like an ad. she looks like a deer caught in headlights trying to cover herself up with a purse..meh