6326 replies · 3778128 views

Great content, ser_franklin, but allow me to give you some tech advice with scanning: If you're going to take all of the time to handle the originals and put them on a scanner, you need to be scanning at 300dpi minimum resolution, maybe even 400dpi. Keep the originals, and then process another copy with a very subtle blur of only 2-3 pixes (I forgot the exact settings), which won't affect details but will eliminate the interference patterns of the dots on computer screens so the scans look good at any zoom level.
If you search my posts you can see examples of how scans look with these settings. Here's one:
<___base_url___>/topic/725-stephanie-seymour/?do=embed&comment=4216837&embedComment=4216837&embedDo=findComment
On 5/31/2021 at 7:18 PM, slacker said:Great content, ser_franklin, but allow me to give you some tech advice with scanning: If you're going to take all of the time to handle the originals and put them on a scanner, you need to be scanning at 300dpi minimum resolution, maybe even 400dpi. Keep the originals, and then process another copy with a very subtle blur of only 2-3 pixes (I forgot the exact settings), which won't affect details but will eliminate the interference patterns of the dots on computer screens so the scans look good at any zoom level.
If you search my posts you can see examples of how scans look with these settings. Here's one:
<___base_url___>/topic/725-stephanie-seymour/?do=embed&comment=4216837&embedComment=4216837&embedDo=findComment
Thanks for the hints and suggestions... Technology is not my forte 🥴, but i'll give it another go soon, since I have more scans as well 👍🏽

2 hours ago, ser_franklin said:Thanks for the hints and suggestions... Technology is not my forte 🥴, but i'll give it another go soon, since I have more scans as well 👍🏽
You'll thank me later, trust me! Here's another post from a few years ago with my scans, and in the post I said "600 dpi, no blur or descreening," which is maybe overkill, but no doubt the best quality:
<___base_url___>/topic/725-stephanie-seymour/?do=embed&comment=4213214&embedComment=4213214&embedDo=findCommentOne more:
<___base_url___>/topic/725-stephanie-seymour/?do=embed&comment=4213201&embedComment=4213201&embedDo=findComment

4 hours ago, fumi said:Escada 1991
Scanned by me
Apple M1 & VueScan 9
Epson V550 - 24Bit Color - 400ppi
Restoration & Color Corrections - Adobe Photoshop
Uncompressed TIFF File & Lossy JPEG
JPEG Image(s) - (TIFF Files shown as attachments)
Amazing!
21 hours ago, slacker said:
You'll thank me later, trust me! Here's another post from a few years ago with my scans, and in the post I said "600 dpi, no blur or descreening," which is maybe overkill, but no doubt the best quality:
<___base_url___>/topic/725-stephanie-seymour/?do=embed&comment=4213214&embedComment=4213214&embedDo=findCommentOne more:
<___base_url___>/topic/725-stephanie-seymour/?do=embed&comment=4213201&embedComment=4213201&embedDo=findComment
i have rescanned the Sante D'Orazio editorial, which was probably the most problematic since the rain in the editorial amplified those dots even more....should be a little improved now