Myspace anybody?

What's wrong with Republican?

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

This is going to piss off rebublicans but I'll tell what wrong:

- They are too religious

- They are too conservative

- They are too militant

- They want poor people stay poor or even get poorer.

- They think money equals happiness

- They are against sexual minorities

- They don't want to practise nature conservation

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

Actually if you know what each of those things mean, then u will see they are good things

Religious - scrupulously and conscientiously faithful

Conservative - maintain existing views, conditions, or institutions "traditional"

Militant - aggressively active (as in a cause)

Poor people - Not true. There are lots of welfare programs available for poor people. I did a report on it, there are also job placement agenecies. Its up to those poor people if they want help or not.

Money = Happiness - A lot of people that are wealthy are wealthy because they worked hard. even domocrats are able to do that. so by saying that republicans think that money = happiness, democrats believe lack of money = happiness? a democrat wouldnt be happy with money?

Sexual Minorities - Many types of people are against sexual minorities, i happen to know homosexuals and im cool with them, but i do not believe they should be married. Its against many peoples religions as well.

Nature Conservation - REP America, Republicans For Environmental Protection

Actually, there is nothing wrong with being a Republican

or a Democrat or whatever. There is no good or bad,

because each person does what he believes is good,

so basically everything that a person does is good.

Nothing is absolute, except subjectivity.

Ergo, once you understand this, labels such

as "smart" or "stupid", "good" or "bad", "Republican"

or "Democrat" become totally meaningless.

"There is nothing either good or bad, but thinking makes it so."~William Shakespeare

I agree

Look at the birthrate around the world, much more females are being born than males. Also, females have a longer life expectancy than males.

Sexual minorities = homosexuals etc. Straight women and men belong to the majority.

1) Religious - scrupulously and conscientiously faithful

2) Conservative - maintain existing views, conditions, or institutions "traditional"

3) Militant - aggressively active (as in a cause)

4) Poor people - Not true. There are lots of welfare programs available for poor people. I did a report on it, there are also job placement agenecies. Its up to those poor people if they want help or not.

5) Money = Happiness - A lot of people that are wealthy are wealthy because they worked hard. even domocrats are able to do that. so by saying that republicans think that money = happiness, democrats believe lack of money = happiness? a democrat wouldnt be happy with money?

6) Sexual Minorities - Many types of people are against sexual minorities, i happen to know homosexuals and im cool with them, but i do not believe they should be married. Its against many peoples

Let's ok back to the topic here.End of story.

1) Faithful to the "truth" told by someone else.

2) All things should not be maintained. World goes on and changes...

3) Since when has aggressive behavior been a good thing?

4) Poor people are just used in those programs.

5) It is one of the biggest self-deception of America to thing anyone can get wealthy just working hard. Many poor people have 2 jobs and still they are poor! How can poor people get good education when their schools suck and they can't afford to universities. In America you have much much better possibilities to have a wealthy life if you have rich parents. Luck is also very important. Rich people are too rich (were do they need all the millions?), poor people are too poor and the middle class (were most people should belong) is getting smaller. Enough money is inevitable for happiness but does not quarantee it. Enough money = middle class. Happiness is a complex thing consisting of many many things.

6) It is not other people's business if homosexuals get married. Religious people are extremely stupid if they think homosexuals getting married is away from them. This is a good example of how religion makes it difficult to use own brain. Homosexuals have rights too and in this case it should overrule the rights of religious people.

7) REP America? Never heard of them. I guess George W. Bush does not belong to them? I always knew good republicans do exist!

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

There is no right or wrong.

We do the things because we think they are good.

Simple as that. You may think that religion is stupid, religious people don't think that religion is stupid. You think Ines is pretty, but my friends say she "looks like a man" (Yes, I purposedly added in this example to raise your blood pressure). Only subjectivity is absolute, remember that.

1)You are a free-thinker, that itself does not make sense.

2)Some old things are good.

3)I think he means resolution. Doing things whole-heartedly, not half-assedly.

4&5)If there is no poor people, can there be rich people?

6)To some people marriage ceremony should remain a holy union between a man and a woman. Some people attach a value, a significant level of importance to that. Personally, I don't. Then again, I don't care much about many trivial things like birthdays and other ceremonies.

7)Read more.

There is no right or wrong.

We do the things because we think they are good.

Simple as that. You may think that religion is stupid, religious people don't think that religion is stupid. You think Ines is pretty, but my friends say she "looks like a man" (Yes, I purposedly added in this example to raise your blood pressure). Only subjectivity is absolute, remember that.

1)You are a free-thinker, that itself does not make sense.

2)Some old things are good.

3)I think he means resolution. Doing things whole-heartedly, not half-assedly.

4&5)If there is no poor people, can there be rich people?

6)To some people marriage ceremony should remain a holy union between a man and a woman. Some people attach a value, a significant level of importance to that. Personally, I don't. Then again, I don't care much about many trivial things like birthdays and other ceremonies.

7)Read more.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

Your blood pressure's rising already! AHAHAHAHA...Perfect!

Now, there's meaning to my life!

Your blood pressure's rising already! AHAHAHAHA...Perfect!

Now, there's meaning to my life!

I said that all because I can, HAHA

Your blood pressure's rising already! AHAHAHAHA...Perfect!

Now, there's meaning to my life!

Wrong, I said no effect on my blood pressure.

I said that all because I can, HAHA

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

You are a jerk!

Your blood pressure's rising already! AHAHAHAHA...Perfect!

Now, there's meaning to my life!

Wrong, I said no effect on my blood pressure.

I said that all because I can, HAHA

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

You are a jerk!

Is that's the best you can say?

So I am a Nazi jerk with third-degree burns in my brain? I rule!

so um...anyone else with a myspace?

There is no right or wrong.

We do the things because we think they are good.

Simple as that. You may think that religion is stupid, religious people don't think that religion is stupid. You think Ines is pretty, but my friends say she "looks like a man" (Yes, I purposedly added in this example to raise your blood pressure). Only subjectivity is absolute, remember that.

1)You are a free-thinker, that itself does not make sense.

2)Some old things are good.

3)I think he means resolution. Doing things whole-heartedly, not half-assedly.

4&5)If there is no poor people, can there be rich people?

6)To some people marriage ceremony should remain a holy union between a man and a woman. Some people attach a value, a significant level of importance to that. Personally, I don't. Then again, I don't care much about many trivial things like birthdays and other ceremonies.

7)Read more.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

About the beauty of In

worshipper pa lives in finland

exactly... he should leave American affairs to us Americans. <_<

lets not even go there...

i'll keep my opinion about iraq to myself b/c it is obviously a very sensitive subj/issue. i will say tho, that altho worshipper pa does not live in the US, that doesnt necessarily mean he cant make an accurate assessment about US affairs. SOCOM, ur comment implies that someone outside of a particular country cant make a judgment call about that country. that would suggest then that even we, as americans, should never butt into another country's business or make a judgment call about atrocities going on in other countries, etc. and while i def. agree that americans have first hand knowledge about what goes on here, sometimes an outside opinion can be less biased.

exactly... he should leave American affairs to us Americans.  <_<

As long as USA is messing around everywhere it will be critized. <_<

No comment. But our Prime Minister could eat the corn out of George Dubya's poo. Very disappointing, but the long term rewards shall be good for our economy (bunny)