The "What Are You Thinking About Right Now?" PIP
39794 replies · 3613635 views
Early reports are that it's all theatrical as Iran gave Qatar warning and they told the US as the base was already evacuated. 
Also bases in Iraq.
Fake news.
Excellent news if really 100% true.
26 minutes ago, Stromboli1 said:Excellent news if really 100% true.
Israel is directly supported by the US from a supply, intelligence, and recon standpoint- this means all are now considered legitimate targets by Iran.
I don't think that it is in Iran's best interest to drag the US into this war further than the current situation.
But certainly in the interests of Russia & China they could see Iran as their proxy to further weaken the United States.
If you know you know! 
16 minutes ago, Stromboli1 said:
A big part of Missile warfare is forcing the enemy to expend AA missiles. So if Trump's (likely fraudulent) claim is true than if $10 million dollar PATRIOT missiles are expended it cost the taxpayer $130,000,000.
15 minutes ago, Cult Icon said:A big part of Missile warfare is forcing the enemy to expend AA missiles. So if Trump's (likely fraudulent) claim is true than if $10 million dollar PATRIOT missiles are expended it cost the taxpayer $130,000,000.
I don't the crazy money involved in the last few days, but it's cheaper than a war with Iran. It's certainly less money that a former POTUS gave to Iran which put us in this position in the first place, that's for another time.
Yes Trump did endorse this fucking warmonger!
I wonder if Israel and Iran are aware of this "deal"?
11 minutes ago, Matt! said:I wonder if Israel and Iran are aware of this "deal"?
Skeptical hippo x2
Skeptical hippo x1
Well.. I guess, folks ...we’re back at step one. Again.
On a more positive note, Europe has adopted Canada! Tariff-free maple syrup for everyone! 
3 hours ago, Stromboli1 said:I don't the crazy money involved in the last few days, but it's cheaper than a war with Iran. It's certainly less money that a former POTUS gave to Iran which put us in this position in the first place, that's for another time.
The US is currently participating in a War with Iran though? The B-2 mission & the AA cost a lot of funds and they just started. The ordinance they expended on the target is a high value asset and the US only has a small number of them.
The Iranians have proven designs (in Ukraine) of missiles/drones designed to exhaust Western AA missile stockpiles and make it very expensive. The Patriot AA missile costs more than the missiles that are shot at it and usually a lot more than the object getting struck.
If this conflict manages to end soon then it would be money worth spending but if it doesn't and the US has to constantly expend AA missiles/airstrikes in the middle east for years it would cost a lot.
46 minutes ago, Stromboli1 said:
W