Celebrity Scoop (cycle 1 & 2) Locked

85669 replies · 806662 views

The Inner Sexiness's avatar
The Inner Sexiness
Posts: 50066
#85661
On 5/8/2016 at 11:54 AM, lostdiadem said:

 

 

What if, for the new Scooper edition, we nominate all the new names added after the last one we halled when the comp started? So there would be all different celebs and models and so there would be new winners and so on.. So a hall with new names might be a good idea for your comp, too!  

 

Something else i was thinking, if any of the Rookies from CSB 1 is on the current HoF list they would automatically be qualified for CSB 2. And any names on the current list that wasn't on the previous list would then be considered Rookies for CSB 2

The Inner Sexiness's avatar
The Inner Sexiness
Posts: 50066
#85662
On 5/14/2016 at 3:18 PM, Stormbringer said:

I suggest:

We start a new hall from scratch BUT without repeating the names that made it into the last hall. Then once we reach 200 names again (or 300) we can repeat those from the first hall, but not those from the one immediately before. 

Makes sense?

(And I think this was on the rules @PinkCouture posted).

 

Sounds fine to me if most of you are ok w/ it as well If that's the case I think 200 is better b/c it is less names to keep track of. TBH as much as like some of the Titans like Ale, Adri, Candic, etc. I am kinda sick of seeing them in competitions over & over again 

I was also thinking for the reset we carry over the current top 10 on the list (Kaia Gerber, Carolina Sanchez, Miquela Vos, Rachel Nichols, Georgia Grace Martin, etc.) That way there are some lesser known celebs on the list instead of the same popular ones over & over again. Yes? No?

 

E
EngSciNaGirl
Posts: 40313
#85663
15 hours ago, PinkCouture said:

Yes? No?

Yes  

i should probably make better mistakes's avatar
i should probably make better mistakes
Posts: 27674
#85664

yes!

heavy is the crown;'s avatar
heavy is the crown;
Posts: 34244
#85665
16 hours ago, PinkCouture said:

Yes? No?
 

So, if I understood correctly, we start from scratch with new names that are not in this list, right?

The Inner Sexiness's avatar
The Inner Sexiness
Posts: 50066
#85666
10 hours ago, lostdiadem said:

So, if I understood correctly, we start from scratch with new names that are not in this list, right?

 

Yes. We are also going to carry-over the names on the current top 10 list (Kaia Gerber, Carolina Sanchez, Miquela Vos, Rachel Nichols, Georgia Grace Martin, etc.) since most of you contributed it, it is more fair then having one person create a whole new list. Make sense? If so, I am going to start the thread soon

Kingdom of Rats...'s avatar
Kingdom of Rats...
Posts: 50708
#85667

^ Makes sense. We'll be playing on a new thread then?

And something maybe could be done so that celebs such as Ale, Adriana, Candice, etc. won't be appearing over and over again every two cycles?. But anyway, having the option to repeat names every 2 cycles doesn't mean they'll have to be in again. It just opens the possibility.

The Inner Sexiness's avatar
The Inner Sexiness
Posts: 50066
#85668
38 minutes ago, Stormbringer said:

^ Makes sense. We'll be playing on a new thread then?

And something maybe could be done so that celebs such as Ale, Adriana, Candice, etc. won't be appearing over and over again every two cycles?. But anyway, having the option to repeat names every 2 cycles doesn't mean they'll have to be in again. It just opens the possibility.

 

Yes. I am starting the new thread soon. To make it easier for you guys I am alphabetizing the names of the most recent cycle

 

Let's revisit the conversation about The Powerhouses (Ale, Adri, Candi, etc) as we come closer to the end of the next cycle. We will take it a step at a time and see how everything goes. Sound good?

heavy is the crown;'s avatar
heavy is the crown;
Posts: 34244
#85669

Then it's a yes for me!  

Page of 4284