2212 replies · 661107 views

Back up to 101% ![]()




when the show gonna be aired ? or when the full video to be downloadable ?
vote for emilyY!!!
= DEPOSITFILES ~ FILEVICE ~ ULTRAMEGABIT
[191,00 Mo ; 10 min 33 sec ; 640x360 ; .avi] >>> SI Swimsuit 2013 - Adaora
= DEPOSITFILES ~ FILEVICE ~ ULTRAMEGABIT
[029,90 Mo ; 01 min 38 sec ; 640x360 ; .avi] >>> SI Swimsuit 2013 - Alana Blanchard
= DEPOSITFILES ~ FILEVICE ~ ULTRAMEGABIT
[237,00 Mo ; 13 min 03 sec ; 640x360 ; .avi] >>> SI Swimsuit 2013 - Alyssa Miller
= DEPOSITFILES ~ FILEVICE ~ ULTRAMEGABIT
[249,00 Mo ; 12 min 42 sec ; 640x360 ; .avi] >>> SI Swimsuit 2013 - Anne V
= DEPOSITFILES ~ FILEVICE ~ ULTRAMEGABIT
[204,00 Mo ; 11 min 24 sec ; 640x360 ; .avi] >>> SI Swimsuit 2013 - Ariel Meredith
= DEPOSITFILES ~ FILEVICE ~ ULTRAMEGABIT
[219,00 Mo ; 12 min 19 sec ; 640x360 ; .avi] >>> SI Swimsuit 2013 - Chrissy Teigen
= DEPOSITFILES ~ FILEVICE ~ ULTRAMEGABIT
[204,00 Mo ; 11 min 21 sec ; 640x360 ; .avi] >>> SI Swimsuit 2013 - Cintia Decker
= DEPOSITFILES ~ FILEVICE ~ ULTRAMEGABIT
[184,00 Mo ; 10 min 01 sec ; 640x360 ; .avi] >>> SI Swimsuit 2013 - Emily Didonato
= DEPOSITFILES ~ FILEVICE ~ ULTRAMEGABIT
[024,80 Mo ; 01 min 29 sec ; 640x360 ; .avi] >>> SI Swimsuit 2013 - Eva De Goede & Ellen Hoog
= DEPOSITFILES ~ FILEVICE ~ ULTRAMEGABIT
[159,00 Mo ; 08 min 38 sec ; 640x360 ; .avi] >>> SI Swimsuit 2013 - Genevieve Norton
= DEPOSITFILES ~ FILEVICE ~ ULTRAMEGABIT
[165,00 Mo ; 09 min 11 sec ; 640x360 ; .avi] >>> SI Swimsuit 2013 - Hanna Davis
= DEPOSITFILES ~ FILEVICE ~ ULTRAMEGABIT
[169,00 Mo ; 09 min 23 sec ; 640x360 ; .avi] >>> SI Swimsuit 2013 - Irina Shayk
= DEPOSITFILES ~ FILEVICE ~ ULTRAMEGABIT
[177,00 Mo ; 09 min 53 sec ; 640x360 ; .avi] >>> SI Swimsuit 2013 - Jessica Gomes
= DEPOSITFILES ~ FILEVICE ~ ULTRAMEGABIT
[181,00 Mo ; 09 min 50 sec ; 640x360 ; .avi] >>> SI Swimsuit 2013 - Jessica Perez
= DEPOSITFILES ~ FILEVICE ~ ULTRAMEGABIT
[157,00 Mo ; 08 min 51 sec ; 640x360 ; .avi] >>> SI Swimsuit 2013 - Julie Henderson
= DEPOSITFILES ~ FILEVICE ~ ULTRAMEGABIT
[178,00 Mo ; 09 min 58 sec ; 640x360 ; .avi] >>> SI Swimsuit 2013 - Kate Boch
= DEPOSITFILES ~ FILEVICE ~ ULTRAMEGABIT
[240,00 Mo ; 13 min 18 sec ; 640x360 ; .avi] >>> SI Swimsuit 2013 - Kate Upton
= DEPOSITFILES ~ FILEVICE ~ ULTRAMEGABIT
[030,80 Mo ; 01 min 44 sec ; 640x360 ; .avi] >>> SI Swimsuit 2013 - Michelle Yenneke
= DEPOSITFILES ~ FILEVICE ~ ULTRAMEGABIT
[159,00 Mo ; 08 min 44 sec ; 640x360 ; .avi] >>> SI Swimsuit 2013 - Natasha Barnard
= DEPOSITFILES ~ FILEVICE ~ ULTRAMEGABIT
[221,00 Mo ; 12 min 11 sec ; 640x360 ; .avi] >>> SI Swimsuit 2013 - Nina Agdal

I can't resist...
Adaora: Beautiful smile, beautiful curves. I'd love to see her again next year. Personally, I'd like to see more women of African and Asian ethnicity in the swimsuit issue, but that's just me. I'd love to see Oluchi Onweagba return, and I liked Kirby Griffin last year. Oh well.
Alyssa Miller: My personal favorite. With the right mix of tan skin, sweat, and sand, she's incredibly sexy. I hope she gets the cover next year.
Anne V: She doesn't do much for me. Pretty smile I guess.
Ariel Meredith: I like her. See my comments for Adaora.
Chrissy Teigen: She doesn't do much for me.
Cintia Dicker: Beautiful and classy. Please keep her.
Emily Didonato: Emily's face is just stunning. Her body type is not quite SI conventional, but I think she's quite sexy, and I generally think the arguments I hear in favor of Kate's body type make better sense for Emily (and possibly for Jessica Gomes as well?). I didn't like the swimsuits chosen for her this year, but I'd still like to see her back next year.
Genevieve Morton: The odd thing about Genevieve is that I've seen some great swimsuit pics for her- just not the ones in SI.
Hannah Davis: Very pretty. I'd like to see her again next year.
Irina Shayk: Beautiful and sultry. Absolutely keep her.
Jessica Gomes: I keep hoping Jessica will have a pictorial that matches her first year in SI, but I don't think the last two years have matched up. She's still a beauty though, so I say keep her. And I'd rather watch her dance than Kate.
Jessica Perez: She doesn't do much for me.
Julie Henderson: She doesn't do much for me.
Kate Bock: Hmmm...I say keep her another year. Some of her pics were really beautiful, but others not so much.
Kate Upton: A keeper, of course.
Natasha Barnard: My pick for Rookie of the Year. I hope she's back next year.
Nina Agdal: Nina is undeniably gorgeous. Bring her back, and give her the cover the year after Alyssa gets it.

I guess Emily should be winning this vote and she has a chance whenever SI basically resets the numbers toward the end of the voting. Emily has more online supporters, better modeling resume, the most twitter followers, and the most total SI rookie YT video views. But do you know who is in a close second place? Kate.
And yet google trends for the last week, hell the last 48 hours is showing a higher index search for Hannah Davis over Emily. o.o
Anyways guys you need to stop putting faith into numbers that add up to a 101% lol it's rigged at this point. IF they do the same thing that they did last year the numbers will all balance out a week or so before voting ends. At that point anyone can win.

LMAO at the 101% ... Seriously, why do they even bother on doing a voting if they will make Kate their favorite girl no matter what? I guess we just need to look at MJ's twitter to see who's ass she kisses the most and then we'll know who's going to be back and who won't.

LMAO at the 101% ... Seriously, why do they even bother on doing a voting if they will make Kate their favorite girl no matter what? I guess we just need to look at MJ's twitter to see who's ass she kisses the most and then we'll know who's going to be back and who won't.
Anyways guys you need to stop putting faith into numbers that add up to a 101% lol it's rigged at this point. IF they do the same thing that they did last year the numbers will all balance out a week or so before voting ends. At that point anyone can win.

That still doesn't explain why the votes are almost exactly the same as when the voting started? Does it mean that people stopped voting or the same people are voting the same way every single day? ![]()

The voting is rigged.
I literally set up an autovoting clicker to vote over 10,000 times last year to test this, and the numbers never moved. Not to mention, a mere week before the results were final, rookies like Adaora who were running at 3% shot up to within a percent of the leaders. It's a joke. Don't bother worrying about it.
Anyways guys you need to stop putting faith into numbers that add up to a 101% lol it's rigged at this point. IF they do the same thing that they did last year the numbers will all balance out a week or so before voting ends. At that point anyone can win.
Not saying it's not rigged, but the 101% isn't necessarily a sign of it.
eg.
14.6% -> 15%
26.6% -> 27%
19.1% -> 19%
39.7% -> 40%
Left side adds to 100%, right to 101%. It can happen if you're just looking at the rounded numbers.
In any case, the results are completely backwards to how I'd vote ![]()
i wonder how many people clicking on "kate" for rookie of the year think they're voting for kate upton? ![]()

Looks like SI realized they were screwing it too much with the voting, changed the numbers already so it gives 100%
Emily -> 15%
Hannah -> 27%
Kate -> 40%
Natasha -> 19%

The voting is rigged.
I literally set up an autovoting clicker to vote over 10,000 times last year to test this, and the numbers never moved. Not to mention, a mere week before the results were final, rookies like Adaora who were running at 3% shot up to within a percent of the leaders. It's a joke. Don't bother worrying about it.

Nah, that wasn't what happened.
If they were reacting to manipulation, my vote spam would have moved the votes and then they would have moved them back. I'd have seen a bump based on who I was autoclicking. But the vote percentages didn't move. Resetting the vote as you suggest they might have done isn't a "fix," it's a further corruption of this alleged election.
If they really cared about preventing manipulation, or conducting an honest (one person->one vote) poll, they'd have linked votes to Facebook or Twitter accounts, or even IP addresses. It does none of these things, and there's no ethical reason given their utter lack of giving a crap for voting as often as anyone wants. Check any popular rookie's thread, voting often is exactly what people are suggesting everyone do. But that's fine because I don' think the votes actually count.
If they are freezing the numbers to prevent manipulation, that means they have the ability to detect it, why not simply use that to halt further voting? Occam's razor suggests that the poll is more likely to be bullshit, than some elaborate anti-ballot stuffing protection in a poll that isn't concerned with multiple votes in the first place.
Like I said the first time I posted about it: Elections almost always make sense. When they don't make sense, be suspicious.
In any case it's a fairly trivial thing, so if people want to assume it's legit anyway and go ahead and vote, I'm no-one to tell you otherwise.

It's hard to find girls that meet SI requirements. I'm going to throw out Thea Helle and Talita Correa for your consideration.