334 replies · 62242 views

Voted ![]()

In "Group 36, Match 4" you can only see a bit of Monique's face.
Also, could showing the previous year's rank on the picture pages influence people's choice? Wouldn't it lessen the chance of bias if the previous year's rank wasn't displayed in the picture before each vote?

In "Group 36, Match 4" you can only see a bit of Monique's face.
Also, could showing the previous year's rank on the picture pages influence people's choice? Wouldn't it lessen the chance of bias if the previous year's rank wasn't displayed in the picture before each vote?
True about Monique. But, I only use photos from SI itself. Search through the history of all of Monique's (two) photos in SI, and you'll see that both are from behind. That one is actually the only one that shows even a little bit of her face! So, that's why I use that one. ![]()
As for the rank... you may be right, but maybe not. I will submit that there have been plenty of higher ranked models who get killed by lower ranked ones. So, I don't think it influences many people. Does it influence you? Honestly I'm just curious... not being a jerk. I often wonder what different people use as criteria for voting. Do they look only at the photos? Do they look at the rank? Do they look at the appearances? Do they consider everything? I'm not sure!
Besides, I use a lot of geeky math to determine those current ranks, so I like to use them in my Photoshop match templates. It brings out the inner nerd inside of me. ![]()


![]()

In "Group 36, Match 4" you can only see a bit of Monique's face.
Also, could showing the previous year's rank on the picture pages influence people's choice? Wouldn't it lessen the chance of bias if the previous year's rank wasn't displayed in the picture before each vote?
True about Monique. But, I only use photos from SI itself. Search through the history of all of Monique's (two) photos in SI, and you'll see that both are from behind. That one is actually the only one that shows even a little bit of her face! So, that's why I use that one.
As for the rank... you may be right, but maybe not. I will submit that there have been plenty of higher ranked models who get killed by lower ranked ones. So, I don't think it influences many people. Does it influence you? Honestly I'm just curious... not being a jerk. I often wonder what different people use as criteria for voting. Do they look only at the photos? Do they look at the rank? Do they look at the appearances? Do they consider everything? I'm not sure!
Besides, I use a lot of geeky math to determine those current ranks, so I like to use them in my Photoshop match templates. It brings out the inner nerd inside of me.
"True about Monique. But, I only use photos from SI itself. Search through the history of all of Monique's (two) photos in SI, and you'll see that both are from behind. That one is actually the only one that shows even a little bit of her face! So, that's why I use that one. :)"
This is the image you used for group 36 match 4:
http://imageupper.com/i/?S0200010070021N14122157131184275
This is the image you used in the past:
http://imageupper.com/i/?S0200010090061Y14108352071183601
The one you used in the past you can see a lot more of her face.
I think the displayed past ratings might influence me and others. That's why I try not to look at them before I decide.They could still be shown in the results of the voting.

The one you used in the past you can see a lot more of her face.
I think the displayed past ratings might influence me and others. That's why I try not to look at them before I decide.They could still be shown in the results of the voting.
Oh yes, you are correct. I actually thought I had used the one I used before, where her head was at least turned. I shouldn't have used the one where you can't see her face. More importantly, SI should have the decency to at least show the face of any model that is used in their magazine. ![]()

By the way, the rankings displayed are not "past" rankings. They're current rankings derived from the models' appearances, covers, and results in previous competitions. So, there's a historical element to them (the previous competitions bit), but they are current. To me, it's like seeing the ranking of teams in a sporting event. When you pick the winner of the match in advance, their rank is only interesting, but you're going to vote for the team you think will win the match regardless of rank.
I don't know... I like the ranks there... they give the voter some more information for better or worse, so I'm going to keep them. ![]()
One more thing... a cool stat: The higher ranked model has won 117 of 148 matches so far. But, lots of those are against lopsided competition. So, if you count only the matches where the rank differential is 30 or less, then the higher ranked model has won 7 and lost 4. So, those lower ranked models are winning a good amount of the matches where they actually have a realistic shot at winning them.
Thanks for the interest. I hope you keep voting and following along!




In "Group 36, Match 4" you can only see a bit of Monique's face.
Also, could showing the previous year's rank on the picture pages influence people's choice? Wouldn't it lessen the chance of bias if the previous year's rank wasn't displayed in the picture before each vote?
True about Monique. But, I only use photos from SI itself. Search through the history of all of Monique's (two) photos in SI, and you'll see that both are from behind. That one is actually the only one that shows even a little bit of her face! So, that's why I use that one.
As for the rank... you may be right, but maybe not. I will submit that there have been plenty of higher ranked models who get killed by lower ranked ones. So, I don't think it influences many people. Does it influence you? Honestly I'm just curious... not being a jerk. I often wonder what different people use as criteria for voting. Do they look only at the photos? Do they look at the rank? Do they look at the appearances? Do they consider everything? I'm not sure!
Besides, I use a lot of geeky math to determine those current ranks, so I like to use them in my Photoshop match templates. It brings out the inner nerd inside of me.
"True about Monique. But, I only use photos from SI itself. Search through the history of all of Monique's (two) photos in SI, and you'll see that both are from behind. That one is actually the only one that shows even a little bit of her face! So, that's why I use that one. :)"
This is the image you used for group 36 match 4:
http://imageupper.com/i/?S0200010070021N14122157131184275
This is the image you used in the past:
http://imageupper.com/i/?S0200010090061Y14108352071183601
The one you used in the past you can see a lot more of her face.
I think the displayed past ratings might influence me and others. That's why I try not to look at them before I decide.They could still be shown in the results of the voting.
Here's the better question. She only made the magazine once, so those pictures were both taken in the same year, why in the world does one of them make her look almost black, and the other looks white.

"True about Monique. But, I only use photos from SI itself. Search through the history of all of Monique's (two) photos in SI, and you'll see that both are from behind. That one is actually the only one that shows even a little bit of her face! So, that's why I use that one. :)"
This is the image you used for group 36 match 4:
http://imageupper.com/i/?S0200010070021N14122157131184275
This is the image you used in the past:
http://imageupper.com/i/?S0200010090061Y14108352071183601
The one you used in the past you can see a lot more of her face.
I think the displayed past ratings might influence me and others. That's why I try not to look at them before I decide.They could still be shown in the results of the voting.
Here's the better question. She only made the magazine once, so those pictures were both taken in the same year, why in the world does one of them make her look almost black, and the other looks white.
Very true!
The white balance and exposure settings on cameras - and in post processing - have thankfully come a long way. The thing I wish hadn't come a long way: SI's penchant for photoshopping. :yuckky: Thankfully, they toned it down this year. There should be none, in my opinion.




Jess Perez got a tough draw! Had to vote against her!

Jess Perez got a tough draw! Had to vote against her!
I agree. I also voted for Laetitia, personally. I think it'll be a close vote, though! Results coming in a few days... ![]()