The Political Correctness Haters' Club

https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/heat-vision/disneys-bob-iger-says-george-lucas-felt-betrayed-by-star-wars-plans-1242953

Quote

Bob Iger Reveals George Lucas Felt "Betrayed" by Disney's 'Star Wars' Plans

No kidding! Disney are sadists. They're just a bunch of rich snobs who buy stuff from the creative people, just to screw things up in the end

Disney and their SJW crew are disgusting bullies    Their political correctness cult is a whim from heartless rich people.

On 11/9/2019 at 1:50 AM, Enrico_sw said:

https://www.unilad.co.uk/news/robert-pattinson-took-the-batman-role-because-hes-not-a-hero/

 

Pattinson is Batman now    Hollywood is really funny. Let me guess, Batman is woke now. He understands that yesterday he was full of toxic masculinity. Now, he's vegan, he eats soy, read the HuffPost and he wears a pink suit to make amends for being a man  Oh, and he shaves with Gillette, doesn't he?

 

Spoiler

  Reveal hidden contents

 

 

39 minutes ago, SympathysSilhouette said:

Robert Pattinson is the most interesting choice to play the character since Michael Keaton.

The "most interesting choice"? That's a pretty strong statement and I don't see how you back that up.

Batman is a dark character with a lot of moral and physical strength. He has an inner darkness and sometimes he walk the line between good and evil. Pattinson is an "alright actor" (even good sometimes), but his profile doesn't match this role IMHO. Even if he works on his acting, he's still too androgynous.

Now, I understand that, in 2019, in woke Hollywood, any man that looks more dangerous than a gerbil in a cage is seen as "full of toxic masculinity", but if they want an androgynous hero, they can invent their own original story, not distort old ones.

39 minutes ago, SympathysSilhouette said:

Considering we are coming from Ben fucking Affleck, it's an enormous upgrade.

I don't think anyone will defend poor Ben's version of Batman here, but that's not an argument for Pattinson.

Before Ben, it was Christian Bale and his Batman was really great.

Okay, so I've just realised what Kate Moss' last name means. I never met this word before in English, but now that I want to make moss art I had to check it. And I find it so funny that I had to post it here. (oh and wrong topic but wc) 

36 minutes ago, Enrico_sw said:

 

Should send them to a place called the Mid East for a wake up call.

11 hours ago, Enrico_sw said:

 

The "most interesting choice"? That's a pretty strong statement and I don't see how you back that up.

 

Batman is a dark character with a lot of moral and physical strength. He has an inner darkness and sometimes he walk the line between good and evil. Pattinson is an "alright actor" (even good sometimes), but his profile doesn't match this role IMHO. Even if he works on his acting, he's still too androgynous.

 

Now, I understand that, in 2019, in woke Hollywood, any man that looks more dangerous than a gerbil in a cage is seen as "full of toxic masculinity", but if they want an androgynous hero, they can invent their own original story, not distort old ones.

 

 

I don't think anyone will defend poor Ben's version of Batman here, but that's not an argument for Pattinson.

 

Before Ben, it was Christian Bale and his Batman was really great.

Have you seen his work in "The Lost City of Z", "Good Time", "Damsel", ... ?

I feel like too many people are still associating him with the Twilight movies but he has morphed into a very interesting character actor since then.

That's what I mean with interesting choice, he is not your average leading man.

^ I didn't talk about Twilight, it's an older movie and I didn't watch it, so I can't really judge him based on that (though it's true that based on a couple of pics from the movie, you can quickly see that he looks really androgynous in it)

Even in most recent movies like the Lost City of Z he looks androgynous. It's not his fault, that's his persona. He can be a really good actor or whatever, he's not gonna look like Batman.

My guess is that, once again, Woke Hollywood wants to tear down their heritage, especially the masculine figures, because, you know, masculinity is "tooooxic".

You think this is an androgynous look?

 Click to choose files

^ For the average woke producer in Hollywood, he looks like a (toxic) masculine person. Very serious condition. Should be eradicated.

In truth, he looks like an androgynous person with a beard (and I say "person", because women can have beards too, let's be inclusive )