2019 SI Swimsuit
1349 replies · 487774 views
This is all I've got, I'm obviously missing people but I can't be bother to look. If that photographer got the cover then this will be a wreck, there's not a single model in that shoot I think has cover potential 
Location #1 - Kangaroo Island, Australia
ph: Josie Clough
- Camille Kostek (rookie #1)
- Hailey Clauson
- Olivia Culpo
- Samantha Hoopes
- Myla Dalbesio
- Tara Lynn (rookie #2)
Location #2 - Las Catalinas, Costa Rica
ph: James Macari
- Hunter McGrady
- Barbara Palvin
- Lais Ribeiro
- Kate Bock
- Jasmine Sanders (rookie #3)
- Danielle Herrington
Location #3 - Watamu, Kenya
ph: Yu Tsui
- Haley Kalil (rookie #4)
- Paulina Porizkova
- Robin Holzken
- Anne de Paula
- Halima (rookie #8)
Location #4 - Bahamas
ph:
- Winnie Harlow (rookie #5)
- Kelsey Merritt (rookie #6)
- Olivia Brower (rookie #7)
2 hours ago, RIP_Cabrini_Green said:I hope Beto O’Rourke gets a cover as well because he’s a furry.
Why you need to be mean to Furries like that.... Lolololol
You know nothing, Jon Oliver 
Spoiler
Are they posting these quotes to lead up to the cover?!
6 hours ago, Enrico_sw said:You know nothing, Jon Oliver
Spoiler
Reveal hidden contents
He has a point? 
On 5/2/2019 at 8:39 PM, Prettyphile said:@He or She who will not be named.
If said person is in fact the cover photographer, then I have a feeling who got it. In fact all signs point to yes (atm). If he's not, it's fair game.
Actually come to think about it. If she did get the cover then it would make sense considering she's in that gimmicky wheel house of Mj's..
Should I get the Post-It notes ready or just a shredder? 
53 minutes ago, ILUVAdrianaLima said:
Should I get the Post-It notes ready or just a shredder?
Both 
13 minutes ago, Prettyphile said:Both
This is quite the conundrum then!
//
8 hours ago, ILUVAdrianaLima said:
He has a point?
He is perfectly indicative of MJ's strategy. She thinks that the competition is too fierce in the marketing segment "people who love pretty women" (well, that's us 
). So, her new marketing position is to target SJW (that's NOT us 
).
It's the same strategy in identity politics; they don't target the whole population anymore (too complicated), they just bait groups.
In the end, unfortunately, it's all about...
Spoiler
Babs
Seems like they have given Barbara skimpier swimsuits this year. I approve. 
It's also so funny that the people in charge of the Swimsuit Issue talk so much about empowerment while pushing the envelope ever more towards the models being practically naked. Hypocritical much?
I obviously can't speak for everyone left of Joe Biden, but I can't recall reading or hearing anyone with anything close to my politics being impressed by this trend either.
The leftists think it's tepid, box-checking liberalism which doesn't challenge or even seem aware of power (no matter which sort of power structure--or post-structure--a given leftist would want to see criticized, it's definitely not something SI's editors think about).
The liberals generally see it as a lagging indicator, less a bold taboo breaker than a cynical adoption of messaging made acceptable by more controversial activism. In this respect they seem to half agree with conservatives, at least with regards to the former, that it's a kind of cynical pandering. But they're annoyed for a slightly different reason, because they feel patronized.
Typically both, even if they were predisposed to favor such things for other reasons, see it coming from the SI Swimsuit issue as a kind of fruit of a poisonous tree. Different people go back and forth on objectification versus empowerment, but broadly speaking the SI Swimsuit issue is still widely known as something teen boys used to jack off to before free internet porn; so they're disinclined to take any attempts at activism on its cover or in its pages seriously. MJ et al seem to think they're in charge of an influential cultural icon, yet most people think they run a glorified once-yearly lads' mag.
The people who seem to like this sort of stuff? Media liberals, who are their own thing, because they get to be woke in a way their corporate sponsors find acceptable while still showing tits for views. Hence why it gets so much more press than any discourse seems to justify; and also one reason why they seem keen to keep doing it.
If this company ends up with SI, it looks like the end could potentially be near for the print format of the magazine in a few years time.
@Enrico_sw you better delete my quoted post with the pictures. MJ just contacted me asking me to delete them but they still appear in your post!
As a friendly reminder to both old and new members alike. We do not allow Sports Illustrated images, leaked or not, to be posted on the site prior to the release date of the publication.
Anyone found posting SI pictures that are not already published will receive an automatic ban from the forums. ONLY warning.
I found the pictures in her personal topic and I just thought they were officially published somewhere, it was a naive move from me, didn’t mean to cause any harm here or anywhere else. I apologize, guys.
18 minutes ago, lostdiadem said:I found the pictures in her personal topic and I just thought they were officially published somewhere, it was a naive move from me, didn’t mean to cause any harm here or anywhere else. I apologize, guys.
No harm, no foul. We aren't going to risk lawyers again, so we have to take a hard stance on this.
Anyone found posting SI pictures that are not already published BY SI SWIM will receive an automatic ban from the forums. ONLY warning.
Posting again - LEARN IT LIVE IT LOVE IT