donbot

2101 replies · 21899 views

Grossly Incandescent's avatar
Grossly Incandescent
Posts: 42604
#1901
I'm more of a high fashion model fan so I lean towards SI girls that are closer to those dimensions.  If I were to rate this year's SI girls like others did, I would be rating most of them as being indifferent (the rookies in particular.  Outside of Marloes the others haven't registered).  
 
I think they went more for 'the girl next door' than even commercial model looks this time around and the 10 out of 12 new girls reflected that.  
 
Kate Bock, below the neck, is completely what I like and she got a good location (Switz) and a good photographer.  Of course, Marloes and Anne V are the favorites.
 
I got to say that Valerie was a disappointment.  Like Dionni, she is very fair skinned person that works very well with lingerie.  I don't think she even tans so putting her in the desert was wrong.  The artificial tan and makeup didn't work well with her.  She  usually photographs well (I don't agree with the flaming of her at all) if put into a context that works to her strengths.  Natasha Barnard, which I had high hopes for...got unlucky as well and didn't pan out.
 
Hanna's nudes belonged more in playboy than SI but she looked good.  She is also very much 'girl next door' attractive rather than 'successful commercial model'.
 

 

 

Marloes was just divine. I did love seeing those 'out & about' shots too.. unfortunately they're something of a rarity for her, beyond Instagram shots.
Who else did you like? Any surprises.

Thank god they reeled back on the Photoshop this year. Looking back to last year, and even more so 2 years ago it boggles the mind how overboard they went with it.


May as well repost my roundup from the SI thread:
 

 

Hannah D
Great body, but just not a fan.

Favourite pic:


Kate B
No. But nice abs 

Favourite pic:



Natasha
Disappointing, and nowhere near as good as last year. She still looks good though.

Favourite pic:



Valerie
Yikes 
She looks a little rough at the best of times, but yeah.. these shots are not flattering at all.
 

Matching sets are for girls...with cooties!'s avatar
Matching sets are for girls...with cooties!
Posts: 17410
#1902
I just ask if anyone's scanning (unless you're just doing everything?) if they could have these in mind

th_966897337_3_123_107lo.jpg

i'm big in japan's avatar
i'm big in japan
Posts: 11574
#1903

I'm more of a high fashion model fan so I lean towards SI girls that are closer to those dimensions.  If I were to rate this year's SI girls like others did, I would be rating most of them as being indifferent (the rookies in particular.  Outside of Marloes the others haven't registered).  

 

I think they went more for 'the girl next door' than even commercial model looks this time around and the 10 out of 12 new girls reflected that.  

 

Kate Bock, below the neck, is completely what I like and she got a good location (Switz) and a good photographer.  Of course, Marloes and Anne V are the favorites.

 

I got to say that Valerie was a disappointment.  Like Dionni, she is very fair skinned person that works very well with lingerie.  I don't think she even tans so putting her in the desert was wrong.  The artificial tan and makeup didn't work well with her.  She  usually photographs well (I don't agree with the flaming of her at all) if put into a context that works to her strengths.  Natasha Barnard, which I had high hopes for...got unlucky as well and didn't pan out.

 

Hanna's nudes belonged more in playboy than SI but she looked good.  She is also very much 'girl next door' attractive rather than 'successful commercial model'.

i'm big in japan's avatar
i'm big in japan
Posts: 11574
#1904

I just ask if anyone's scanning (unless you're just doing everything?) if they could have these in mind

th_966897337_3_123_107lo.jpg

The entire mag has been scanned Joe.. Just gotta go back to like page 161?ish

http://www.bellazon....61#entry3364006

Grossly Incandescent's avatar
Grossly Incandescent
Posts: 42604
#1905

Unfortunately, I found Emily D to be boring and the retouching was too much.  I've never considered her as having a particularly hot bikini body.  She did get a good location though and I liked those dogs..Her shoot last year was better.

i'm big in japan's avatar
i'm big in japan
Posts: 11574
#1906

I love this.. reminds me of Calvin's snow sculptures

tumblr_n10hdmR2rD1qa2j1zo1_1280.jpg

i'm big in japan's avatar
i'm big in japan
Posts: 11574
#1907

Unfortunately, I found Emily D to be boring and the retouching was too much.  I've never considered her as having a particularly hot bikini body.  She did get a good location though and I liked those dogs..Her shoot last year was better.

Grossly Incandescent's avatar
Grossly Incandescent
Posts: 42604
#1908

Bjegje has a very delicate bone structure and looks good in tight dresses.  But I've always found her presence in the modeling world a little odd.  I've remarked before that Jennka has a considerably prettier face than Bjege..  

 

So you don't like Sara S.?  Her photos were very much come hither, and go to Jail...

i'm big in japan's avatar
i'm big in japan
Posts: 11574
#1909

^Heh. No, I really don't like her look. I said in my roundup that she reminds me of a guy I went to high school with. Portuguese guy with a monobrow

So amongst other things, I find it hard to disassociate her with that.

Grossly Incandescent's avatar
Grossly Incandescent
Posts: 42604
#1910

What do you think of Nadine Leopold?  She's a doll.

 

 

Your snow picture reminds me of an amphibious landing.  Soldiers (with 60 pounds on their backs) are crawling forward in the muddy sand while being fired at by heavy machineguns...mortars, direct fire shells, and artillery exploding around them, spraying deadly shrapnel everywhere.:

 

21-production-art-1024.jpg

 

 

 

----------------------

 

 

As far as famous tanks go, how would you rate the appearances of these three (three to appear in the film, Fury):

 

jbwmA7PfDA44JH.jpg

 

 

jGNN70BrHNh4s.jpg

 

 

jbx6178cc9xwwU.jpg

 

 

-----------

 

 

Hailey looks super sexy here:

 

 

Guess Magazine Spring-Summer 2014

Ph: Stevie and Mada

attachicon.gif 1_new.jpgattachicon.gif 38_new.jpgattachicon.gif 39_new.jpgattachicon.gif 40_new.jpgattachicon.gif 41_new.jpg

 

http://www.guess.com/en/

 
i'm big in japan's avatar
i'm big in japan
Posts: 11574
#1911

^I don't really know what criteria I'm judging them on contemplate.gif

Gut feeling is 3, then 2, then 1

i'm big in japan's avatar
i'm big in japan
Posts: 11574
#1912

What do you think of Nadine Leopold?  She's a doll.

Grossly Incandescent's avatar
Grossly Incandescent
Posts: 42604
#1913

 Did you see Nadine's videos on my thread?

 

I asked you about the tanks to confirm a tank trope...lol.  The German Tiger and Panther Tank (2,3) are the most popular tanks of all time, and a lot of it has to do with their physical appearance & size, which was designed to radiate imagined power (Nazi propaganda).

 

Few are fans of US M4 Sherman.  The big cats are the star of Tank museums such as the one in the UK (Bovington )  or Russia ( Kubrinka).

 

They will be stars of the new Brad pitt movie about tank fighting. : )

i'm big in japan's avatar
i'm big in japan
Posts: 11574
#1914

^Interesting.

Hmm.. Shia LaBeouf is in it..

I watched the Nadine videos - I like the cat one

She could pass as Anne's little sister.

Grossly Incandescent's avatar
Grossly Incandescent
Posts: 42604
#1915

It's notable that Nadine, Erin, Marloes, and Anne... (Austria, USA, Holland, Russia) look alike but are from completely different parts of the world

 

The 57 ton Henschel Tiger (131), one of the stars of 'Fury'..the other is the 68 ton Henschel Tiger II.  Porsche also submitted prototypes but lost both contracts via competitive bidding vs. Henschel

 

What a machine!  

 

post-40981-0-94505100-1393306969_thumb.j

 

:

 

 

 

You know with this movie...I completely don't care about the cast.  Haha.  I find the fact that they are doing armored battles in the West Front (with real equipment) for once in WW2 film the only reason to see it.

 

 

----

 

What were the least attractive girls in SI for you?

 

For me it was probably Gigi.  I'm just not used to that type of baby faced look.  

Niffler!!!'s avatar
Niffler!!!
Posts: 41187
#1916

Not sure why but I want one

I see the lies in your eyes and yet I love you just the same's avatar
I see the lies in your eyes and yet I love you just the same
Posts: 25928
#1917

Donnie your new set is

i'm big in japan's avatar
i'm big in japan
Posts: 11574
#1918

What were the least attractive girls in SI for you?

 

For me it was probably Gigi.  I'm just not used to that type of baby faced look.  

There were 3 girls that are completely unattractive to me, in face and body - Chrissy, Samantha and Kate U.

All the others are on a scale of some attractive qualities up to Marloes.

Funny.. of those three, 2 are on the covers and the other is amongst the ROTY frontrunners

i'm big in japan's avatar
i'm big in japan
Posts: 11574
#1919

Not sure why but I want one

Oh that is awesome

Somehow reminds me of this

i'm big in japan's avatar
i'm big in japan
Posts: 11574
#1920

Donnie your new set is

She is the dream, SS. The dream
Page of 106