General Discussion Older

gocho for president

I nominate OS as my vice-president (who will actually do most of my work)

sounds like a plan to me. i'll just have you assassinated and become president :morning:

that's the way you do it in NY, huh?

ok so how many warnings are going to warrant a ban? or do we want to suspend their posting abilities or put them on mod preview first? also, there's a feature to send the person a PM about the warning, i take it that we're going to PM them about their warning right?

I don't agree that mods and admin need to seek concensus before issuing a warning. When someone sees a member going off in a thread, verbally attacking or whatever, this person needs to be warned and their posting ability suspended immediately. Why should we dick around with idiots that spout off? Sure we COULD delete the posts, but that's crap. It's nothing, it's not even a slap on the wrist. But with that, when a warning has been issued, we all need to be made aware of the issue and why it was done.

Sure, we could all just be lazy and let people get away with all sorts of drama, but that's not what we want here. We want people to respect each other.

Bans, of course, should be handled with consensus.

but this is just my opinion.

I assume that when you say 'warn' the person you'resuggesting to actually start using the warning tool..

Well, I'm out.. long trip from Dallas to Caracas..

I assume that when you say 'warn' the person you'resuggesting to actually start using the warning tool..

haha, ummmmnnyeah

Warn should be up to each of you individualy, you do not need consent from the rest. As for banning (or unbanning) I would suggest that you get the opinions of say 3 people and then go ahead with it.

Obviously I wont be doing any warning or bannings so yall aint gotta listen to me.

As for the nudity, i think it should be enforced as long as I dont have to follow the rule cuz im lazy like that. But i will try (although i probabaly will fail miserably thus the reason ive been warned so much )

ugh. "Please folks, pay no attention to the man behind the nudie pics"

Nudity rules should be upheld, posted as a link, already worked out I see. I think a lot of people are so used to using the upload feature here which doesn't provide a text link. If there's a way of giving people a text link for images containing nudity, that might help enforce the rule. Not talking about losing the thumbs, just the possibility of adding a text link option for attachments. Not sure if that's doable or not.

How many warnings are going to warrant a ban? I think it has to depend on the severity of what the person did. I mean we don't need a severe warning for people posting nudity. There are different degrees of flipping out though, and we should discuss the problem when it occurs and decide based on that, if it should be an immediate ban, or if it should be some kind of stepped procedure.

As for Lolipop, Adrifan, is there some reason she is still here? Considering she was banned originally as Adrifan, I still don't see any reason why we should let her stay.

Another question is: Do we want people to be able to see their own warning level and reasons for any increase in the level? I would think so, but what do you think?

hmm, that is a good idea, if they can see why they were warned..is it possible?

Of course.

then we should do it.

Shall we wait for more input?

Just so you know, each person sees their own warning level, and noone elses.

oh yeah, you're right, its been such a long time since i have been a "member" that i have forgotten, only the member can see their warning

I'll agree with that being a good idea, I mean if they can't see it in the first place there is not that constant reminder there for them, that they have done something stupid.

they can see it now

coolio

sweet

im going to chicago for two weeks, ill try to be around when i can be around.