General Discussion Older

Home to the much acclaimed BZNTM and Forbidden Competitions.

First of all, we have tons of members and a handful or so of participants. People don't come running like it's the People's Choice Awards so acclaimed is a bit much.

Babe Polls, Model IDs and various discussions on women in general. (lots of picture threads too)

No! NO, just no. Don't ever do that again.

Women of print and film advertising and editorials, fashion shows and gracing the covers of countless magazines.

Say what? Didn't I get the shaft for misplacing a comma in a sentence around here yet one is forgotten in the open part of the forum so we look like idiots? Way to gain respect. Not to mention "Women gracing the covers of countless magazines" and/or "Women of gracing the covers of countless magazines" makes absolutely NO sense.

The talented women of films, hollywood, movies and the stage.

Hollywood be all of those, not to mention films and movies are the same. DUH.

Sexy Olympic, professional and amateur athletes alike.

Just sounds like a horny 13 year old boy.

Forum babes

Rot in hell.

Men of print and film advertising and editorials, fashion shows and gracing the covers of countless magazines.

Same as with the woman version.

The talented men of films, hollywood, movies and the stage.

Again, same as with the woman version.

Sexy professional and amateur athletes alike.

Just sounds like a horny 13 year old girl.

Forum studs

:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: Oh, wait. You were serious? No.

Forum babes

Rot in hell.

lol at much acclaimed

the day i wrote that i told nicoler that it sounded like it was the shit hahahaha

lol at much acclaimed

the day i wrote that i told nicoler that it sounded like it was the shit hahahaha

hahaha yes, i remember

Home to the much acclaimed BZNTM and Forbidden Competitions.

First of all, we have tons of members and a handful or so of participants. People don't come running like it's the People's Choice Awards so acclaimed is a bit much.

Babe Polls, Model IDs and various discussions on women in general. (lots of picture threads too)

No! NO, just no. Don't ever do that again.

Women of print and film advertising and editorials, fashion shows and gracing the covers of countless magazines.

Say what? Didn't I get the shaft for misplacing a comma in a sentence around here yet one is forgotten in the open part of the forum so we look like idiots? Way to gain respect. Not to mention "Women gracing the covers of countless magazines" and/or "Women of gracing the covers of countless magazines" makes absolutely NO sense.

The talented women of films, hollywood, movies and the stage.

Hollywood be all of those, not to mention films and movies are the same. DUH.

Sexy Olympic, professional and amateur athletes alike.

Just sounds like a horny 13 year old boy.

Forum babes

Rot in hell.

Men of print and film advertising and editorials, fashion shows and gracing the covers of countless magazines.

Same as with the woman version.

The talented men of films, hollywood, movies and the stage.

Again, same as with the woman version.

Sexy professional and amateur athletes alike.

Just sounds like a horny 13 year old girl.

Forum studs

:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: Oh, wait. You were serious? No.

Instead of just complaining and wasting all the energy into why you dont like it, why not make suggestions as to what you would like it to be. <_<

I would like to thank jimmy for his help in getting it done since I did request help like a week or two ago and hes the only one that chipped in. thank man

You guys spent alot more time picking apart the crap I put there than I spent writing them. Now if you would have spent even half that time on improving even one of the descriptions it would have been time well spent, but instead you felt better being asses. How lovely.

Instead of just complaining and wasting all the energy into why you dont like it, why not make suggestions as to what you would like it to be. <_<

I would like to thank jimmy for his help in getting it done since I did request help like a week or two ago and hes the only one that chipped in. thank man

You posted while I was writing, so that obviously wasn't directed toward you. Thanks man.

As my original post said explicitly, the decriptions I inserted were quick and needed improvement.

Actually Meghan and I started working on suggestions right after that so thanks for acting like you know what the hell goes on away from the board.

I'm sure life in your head is wonderful.

so why the need to critisize, why not just say I dont like them and we are working on other suggestions?

anyways whats done is done, this aint getting no one no where. I will happily take other suggestions, and preferably only constructive critisism from here on. thanks

so why the need to critisize, why not just say I dont like them and we are working on other suggestions?

That would take tact and decency.

Instead of just complaining and wasting all the energy into why you dont like it, why not make suggestions as to what you would like it to be. <_<

oh you mean like you did? you wanted this yet i cant remember you offering any input or suggestions....you definitely should, that would be helpful

You guys spent alot more time picking apart the crap I put there than I spent writing them. Now if you would have spent even half that time on improving even one of the descriptions it would have been time well spent, but instead you felt better being asses. How lovely.

indeed. ok we picked apart the crap but i also think ashley gave some suggestions that are actually useful (e.g. hollywood = movies and film, you can interpret that as 'just write hollywood and stage')

aaand you've been an ass to us (hey you know it, and i'm not gonna pretend like we havent done the same back) so this is kinda what happens when neither party can be civil to each other. that being said, my biggest suggestion (which is kind of too late atm) would have been to run the suggestions by us first before putting them up on the board and then asking us what we thought after the fact. perhaps there would have been less hostilty?

so why the need to critisize, why not just say I dont like them and we are working on other suggestions?

That would take tact and decency.

dont be critisizing lullaby so harshly either. We did jump to conclusions but no need to bash her about it.

that being said, my biggest suggestion (which is kind of too late atm) would have been to run the suggestions by us first before putting them up on the board and then asking us what we thought after the fact. perhaps there would have been less hostilty?

I told him to simply put them up, since no one else had an opinion and that once something was up there it would surely start a discussion (which it obviously did, although a bit negative). Since like most things around here if its put up to a vote, a) no one will ever agree and b) itll take years to get anything done and implemented.

that being said, my biggest suggestion (which is kind of too late atm) would have been to run the suggestions by us first before putting them up on the board and then asking us what we thought after the fact. perhaps there would have been less hostilty?

I told him to simply put them up, since no one else had an opinion and that once something was up there it would surely start a discussion (which it obviously did, although a bit negative). Since like most things around here if its put up to a vote, a) no one will ever agree and b) itll take years to get anything done and implemented.

um i always offer input, so does meghan and so does ashley. mike offers input when its important and he's on. you offer less input than the rest of us, so i dont want to hear it :trout: if we had actually seen something written out i have no doubt people would've said something.

sorry about that jimmy i didnt realize you were told to just go ahead and put them up

i'm away for a minute and look wat happens to you guys

that being said, my biggest suggestion (which is kind of too late atm) would have been to run the suggestions by us first before putting them up on the board and then asking us what we thought after the fact. perhaps there would have been less hostilty?

I told him to simply put them up, since no one else had an opinion and that once something was up there it would surely start a discussion (which it obviously did, although a bit negative). Since like most things around here if its put up to a vote, a) no one will ever agree and b) itll take years to get anything done and implemented.

My only comment to this is that most of us do comment on it and we do come to agreements, it's just there are always two or three people who can't be bothered. The only reason it takes years is people either can't be bothered, as I said, or can't make a concrete decision.

And yeah I can see why you did what you did, because how long did it take people to say one thing or another about the list of warnable offenses? There are still people who haven't said a fucking word about that but there's not much to be done about that now.

Anyway, if you want what we knocked out off the board, I'll post them. And no, it wasn't in our head. I have funner things to be doing in my imagination than coming up with board descriptions.

btw, whoever put this back to the way it was:

thanks

it was missing?

lol yay petraaaaa

not missing, but you know it said Bellazon: Fashion Model and Celebrity forum...and i was like HUH?! thats what i meant

edited it so it would make more sense