General Discussion Older

5589 replies · 31173 views

Devoted to Adriana's avatar
Devoted to Adriana
Posts: 28162
#981

well to answer gocho...the only reason we have th 600 rule is to keep it neat....we can probably up it to what 750??? i think we should ban that ip too capt...she didnt personally pm me and ask but that guy should be banned...now that is a perv.

G
GOCHO
Posts: 2946
#982

Capt. i do not agree on banning the IP.

The user might have done it without knowing the rules, so a pm should be enough.

EDIT: but i havent seen what happend and the pics he posted so i dunno exactly

.
...
Posts: 5743
#983

We can't PM him because he was a guest user. I have not seen him since that day though.

Maybe we can wait and see, if he turns up again.

Although I think that type of rule should be common sense to most users.

It's almost in the same vein as me posting a users address or full name and info. Of course members pictures are far less damaging to privacy than those items above, but should be respected the same none the less, because they are personal items, that the user should have to consent to before someone displays them without their owners permission.

G
GOCHO
Posts: 2946
#984

What did he do exactly? Cuz I might be confused about another thing that happened..

Devoted to Adriana's avatar
Devoted to Adriana
Posts: 28162
#985

i wouldnt be too happy if someone posted half naked pictures of me without asking....let alone if that person is a guest

G
GOCHO
Posts: 2946
#986

.
...
Posts: 5743
#987

Yeah, that's what he did.

G
GOCHO
Posts: 2946
#988

Sorry, now i think very differently.

Ban the IP.

Founder's avatar
Founder
Posts: 3844
#989
nyc_rocks

Joined: 21 Jan 2005

Posts: 25

Location:

 

PostPosted: Tue Jan 25, 2005 12:45 pm    Post subject:  Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster

as i mentioned privately to neo, the "600 pixel width" rule might be a really stupid rule if it's based on what the admins think the average user has their screen resolution set to.

has anyone bothered to check the server logs and find out what percentage of (pathetic) users are actually still using a 640x480 screen? if that percentage is low, and you find that more than 50% of visitors are at 1024x768 then the rule should be changed.

i personally think it's a dumb rule in any case because pandering to losers who can't get a decent screen with how cheap computers are these days is just encouraging the technology to stagnate.

i say this as a database and server admin myself... not someone who's clueless about this stuff.

Capt Snow wrote:

Evil,

Please respect the Bellazon picture posting guidelines. Images must not be posted side by side if they will equal greater than 600 pixels. If you are unsure of just how much 600 pixels is, only post 4 thumbs side by side, and that should be well under the limits. I have edited almost every one of your posts due to you repeatedly doing the same thing.

_________________

new york focking city

nyc_rocks

Joined: 21 Jan 2005

Posts: 25

Location:

 

PostPosted: Tue Jan 25, 2005 12:49 pm    Post subject:  Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster

seriously, can you even run most of today's software on a 640x480 screen? almost everything i do on a computer is made for a minimum of 1024 - says it in the system requirements (my screens are set to 1400x1050 and 1280x1024).

not to mention, most websites today are designed to a spec of 800x600 or 1024x768.

i hate stupid, arbitrary rules that are based on nothing factual. let's see those server stats!

_________________

new york focking city

metioned in the karolina thread.

actually, the rule is there for a purpose. 1st there will be many users on an 800x600 screen. The avatar area takes about 150 pixels, and a 50 pixel "buffer" area is fine.

Devoted to Adriana's avatar
Devoted to Adriana
Posts: 28162
#990

you explain that to him...frankly i think it looks better at the 600 rule

.
...
Posts: 5743
#991

Why exactly should we have to explain the reasons for the guidelines to him?

600 pixel width guarantee's that no one will have to scroll to the right.

Calling people pathetic and losers if they aren't on at least an 800x600 resolution, what the hell is that.

G
GOCHO
Posts: 2946
#992

exactly my thoughts.

Devoted to Adriana's avatar
Devoted to Adriana
Posts: 28162
#993

no one is lucky like me to have 1440 by 900

G
GOCHO
Posts: 2946
#994

nice

I got 1280x800 wich is pretty good for a laptop.

Devoted to Adriana's avatar
Devoted to Adriana
Posts: 28162
#995

thats what i have right now...im using my dads laptop...i had lox resize one of the adriana walls for me....my laptop is in the shop

G
GOCHO
Posts: 2946
#996

nobody ever makes 1280x800 walls

Devoted to Adriana's avatar
Devoted to Adriana
Posts: 28162
#997

ask lox...pm him...he can add it when he makes the other walls...he makes 1440 by 900 now because i asked him

G
GOCHO
Posts: 2946
#998

will do.

Devoted to Adriana's avatar
Devoted to Adriana
Posts: 28162
#999

take a look at this....it could be a good idea

http://www.imageshack.us/syndicate.php

.
...
Posts: 5743
#1000

That looks like it could be pretty useful, wouldn't have to leave here to upload pictures. Pretty cool.

Page of 278