2099 replies · 17926 views
Uhm ... ![]()
mimeto_ivanova 82.137.93.109 6 19-July 10 Members Edit Member
lily_92 82.137.93.109 407 18-July 10 Members Edit Member
naty_sexy 82.137.93.109 188 18-July 10 Members Edit Member
siseto500 82.137.93.109 7387 18-July 10 Members Edit Member
im_naughtyangel 187.33.252.147 0 24-January 12 Members Edit Member
naughtyangel_ 187.33.252.147 0 24-January 12 Members Edit Member
PMed her about it - not sure what to do with those sharing not the same but similar IPS in #659 and #660 ...
And what about siseto? That looks like a serious case since all of those has been used ...

BTW it is a permanent ban for LMS, isn't it?
I think it is permanent. If it wasn't intended to be permanent would have decided to suspended instead, right? ![]()
What do the rest of you think?

Am a little suspicious here ...suspensqib 59.58.148.222 0 Today, 01:32 AM Validating
suspenmof5 59.58.149.245 0 Yesterday, 07:27 AM Validating
Gyncsaifiny 59.58.112.170 0 30-April 12 Validating Edit Memberfeilun 59.58.112.32 0 22-May 10 Members Edit Member
Uhm ...mimeto_ivanova 82.137.93.109 6 19-July 10 Members Edit Member
lily_92 82.137.93.109 407 18-July 10 Members Edit Member
naty_sexy 82.137.93.109 188 18-July 10 Members Edit Member
siseto500 82.137.93.109 7387 18-July 10 Members Edit Member
im_naughtyangel 187.33.252.147 0 24-January 12 Members Edit Membernaughtyangel_ 187.33.252.147 0 24-January 12 Members Edit Member
PMed her about it - not sure what to do with those sharing not the same but similar IPS in #659 and #660 ...
And what about siseto? That looks like a serious case since all of those has been used ...
Ay-yi-yi! ![]()
I cannot do a through check right now b/c I am at work. If someone can start (even if it is just on a few names) that would be great.
Good eye, Carm! Thank you for PMing im_naughtyangel & naughtyangel_. For now I would just suspend the posting abilities of all the members in question. Send them a PM telling them we suspect multiple account incidents. Unless they are able to provide a logical explanation their posting abilities will not be restored. And of course continue keeping an eye out for any additional suspicious activities and red flags.
Thanks for helping and taking over ![]()
Just thought I should keep an eye on the new members for LMS to make a fast return, that's when I found those guys ...

Here is what I found...
China - all from the same region near Beijing
suspensqib 59.58.148.222
suspenmof5 59.58.149.245
Gyncsaifiny 59.58.112.170
feilun 59.58.112.32
I don't think any of them have posted yet. Very likely a multiple account violation and/or spamming. Let's keep an eye on them, esp when they start posting. We will check back on them in a week to see are there any new developments.
-------------------------------
82.137.93.109 - Bulgaria
sisito500 (Joe warned and restricted her posting indefinitely in 2010 for multiple accounts)
mimeto_ivanova
lily_92 (Joe warned and restricted her posting indefinitely in 2010 for multiple accounts)
naty_sexy (LF warned her for trolling in 2010 and her posting abilites were restricted indefinitely)
siseto500 (Came a across this one while investiagting. Not sure why she would create 2 similar usernames)
Based on:
- They all post in similar styles
- Some of "them" have visited each other's profiles.
- Most of them have had previous multiple account violations
- Many of them have similar "personal statements"
It all seems to points to multiple accounts, so I am going ahead with banning all the accounts.
-------------------------------
187.33.252.147 - Brazil
im_naughtyangel
naughtyangel_
Carm, let us know when she/they respond back to your PM. If you get no response by the end of the weekend, we will keep their posting restrictions indefinitely.

Thanks for helping and taking overJust thought I should keep an eye on the new members for LMS to make a fast return, that's when I found those guys ...
Thank YOU for keeping an eye out ![]()
I think Mahi said it best: "maybe, with having multiple accounts,she's already with us. :)"

EDIT: I hope it is ok I unpinned the thread. I don't think the topic is important enough for it to be pinned.
Nevermind, Pretty thought it was best to re-pin the topic (Y)

Here's an interesting one - Talisa has herself a new set reminiscent of strobe lighting effects. Technically, I don't think it's breaking any rules, but a couple of members have already mentioned that they find it irritating. Any thoughts? ![]()
Well, okay, it's kinda irritating, but should we really start censoring signatures that are clearly not breaking any rule? ![]()

I wouldn't want anything removed simply because others didn't like it, but talk of the set possibly causing seizures made me think it was a point worth raising. Just curious about the general consensus. ![]()
![]()
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photosensitive_epilepsy
It may cause seizures, I guess, but how long do you need to look at a sig to get a seizure, I don't know. If you're just scrolling down and see it like for a sec, I don't think it'll do harm? It's an average of 2,4 posts a day since 2010, not that much ...
Since Talisa is a nice one, we could just ask if it's okay for her/him to change it or lower the frequence of the color changes ...
AdrianaSh 78.90.27.183 2 9-August 09 Members
AdrianaShaik 78.90.27.183 13 17-May 08 Members
But last visit was in 2009 ...
IP Address Banned ~PC
187.33.252.147 - Brazilim_naughtyangel
naughtyangel_
Carm, let us know when she/they respond back to your PM. If you get no response by the end of the weekend, we will keep their posting restrictions indefinitely.
Thanks a lot, Pink ![]()
I'll get back to you if I get a response.
AdrianaSh 78.90.27.183 2 9-August 09 MembersAdrianaShaik 78.90.27.183 13 17-May 08 Members
But last visit was in 2009 ...
I disabled "their" posting ability.

Here's an interesting one - Talisa has herself a new set reminiscent of strobe lighting effects. Technically, I don't think it's breaking any rules, but a couple of members have already mentioned that they find it irritating. Any thoughts?![]()
Her set is definitely discomforting to look at and distracting. For me it has not gotten to the point where I cannot deal with it. Besides, she is someone who changes are set every 1-2 months so I doubt it would be up for long.
She isn't breaking any rules. Before we decided to step in, I think this is one of those situations where we could encourage members who dislike her set to politely let her know.
AdrianaSh 78.90.27.183 2 9-August 09 MembersAdrianaShaik 78.90.27.183 13 17-May 08 Members
But last visit was in 2009 ...
I disabled "their" posting ability.
Good call! (Y)

I have some updates regarding jade**, maiya and fashiondream. First I need to know have we contacted jade** about our suspicions that she has multiple accounts?
I will post what I found when i get home tonight ![]()
jamesondimpls 188.4.165.113 0 Today, 05:16 PM Validating ----> DISABLED POSTING ABILITY
PETERMINT 188.4.165.113 0 Today, 05:08 PM Validating ----> SEND EMAIL
queenofthepradagasstation 121.98.74.253 1 1-February 12 Members ----> SEND PM
misscheriedior 121.98.74.253 0 1-February 12 Members ----> DISABLED POSTING ABILITY
Uhm, could you please run a check on IP 127.0.0.1 and tell me what this means?

bump