Cult Icon

I think you'd maybe like this game. The music, voice acting, gameplay, and expansiveness are excellent, but the graphics are dated though.

wow! super dated.  I  have heard of this one as being a classic of sorts.

That blonde likes to exhibit herself a lot when she's pregnant!

Two awesome, 500 page books that I just got:

(shipped from the UK)

I'd thought you'd like Dragon Slayer Marina.

On 11/8/2016 at 9:19 PM, Cult Icon said:

That blonde likes to exhibit herself a lot when she's pregnant!

I'm sure her baby likes her body too!

@Stromboli1

She seems to be exercising even when pregnant...?

nice plastic sword!

She did exercise when pregnant, there's nothing wrong with that and there are no complications either unless you overdo it.

I really do like Hannah Polites' body though, face not so much though. She reminds me of how I view Natalie Roser. Also she's a milf now.

Hannah has a nice warm place she can sit anytime.

The market and Dem reaction to Trump's win has been fascinating for the past couple of days.  

I believe that the next 2 years are going to be very interesting and will define whether or not the Trump administration will succeed, be middling or fail.  

It'll determine whether the old order will decline or if it will rise again.  Obama had his chance but the markets moved away from some of his passions (such as environmentalism) once money realized that these things could not be sustained in society.

Trump can't be "The Donald" anymore.  He must become "President Trump" and be a positive symbol to inspire the nation as a whole to hard struggle and creative achievement.  From the stagnation some light should be able to shine through to pave a way for a new economy.

What do you think of the dirty game of Soros & co. trying to unleash unrest and disorder? How come these anarchist-liberal-bolshevik operations are tolerated in the US?

4 hours ago, 17 Moments of Spring said:

What do you think of the dirty game of Soros & co. trying to unleash unrest and disorder? How come these anarchist-liberal-bolshevik operations are tolerated in the US?

 

I am not as right wing as you but I would call the ruling class environmentalist- socialist yet, at the same time, globalist/economically conservative.  I see soros as merely one of many of a leading culture among the upper classes.  I have his books and overall I see him as one of the leading globalist due his tremendous funding of organizations.

They are tolerated in the US because they are the US and have defined what its leading culture is outside of juedeo-christianity..its a generation of people that were educated in the liberal arts programs of the 1970s (and adopted the idealism of left wing thinkers, spiritualists and philosophers), absorbed the tools of the information revolution of the 1990s/early 2000s and then lead the critical portions of society later on.  They rose to power in the 1990s and largely in the areas with the highest population density and wealth.  For better or for worse, the world of the Clintons, Bushes (to a lessor extent) and the Obamas is their world.  The vast majority of the US Federal gov't, education system, and media are composed of democrats.

4 minutes ago, Cult Icon said:

 

They are tolerated in the US because they are the US and have defined what its culture is..its a generation of people that were educated in the liberal arts programs of the 1970s (and adopted the idealism of left wing thinkers, spiritualists and philosophers), ...

So we think the same. It's because the cultural marxists of the Frankfurt School after WW II and 1968 made their long march to institutions, and occupied them. They became the founding fathers of the academic left. So sad.

I think I would be labeled as a "paleo-conservative" in the US.

21 minutes ago, 17 Moments of Spring said:

 

So we think the same. It's because the cultural marxists of the Frankfurt School after WW II and 1968 made their long march to institutions, and occupied them. They became the founding fathers of the academic left. So sad.

 

I think I would be labeled as a "paleo-conservative" in the US.

I'm an atheist who recognizes the genius of artists, creatives, philosophers, academics, environmentalists etc. but also understands the limits to their idealism.  I admire Marx and even some aspects of the Soviets in certain ways but recognize their failings.

The way I see it- people like soros and al gore do what they do for their megalomania/self esteem (save humanity, save the world ecology) and then try to control society to fulfill their fantasies. 

Today:

What do you think of the American educational system?

3 hours ago, Stromboli1 said:

What do you think of the American educational system?

 K-12 or the universities could improve.  Regulated by an external authority eg. like the SEC.

 I believe both should be public and that K-12 wastes too much of a child's life while imparting not enough.   Perhaps a more focused, occupational type education like in Germany.

Revamping of the curriculum to remove religious and political elements. Focus more on character building, creativity, analysis and leadership. Warfare, entrepreneurship, personal finance, business knowledge, and economics should be required by all.  

In-cooperate a strong liberal arts curriculum (mandatory) for all to develop philosophical and artistic appreciation.

That should be the core along with with verbal. math, and basic science skills.  Then students could specialize.

5 minutes ago, Cult Icon said:

K-12 or the universities could improve.  I believe both should be public and that K-12 wastes too much of a child's life while imparting not enough. 

I've heard people rave about Finland and how they overhauled their educational system in 40 years. I think that it's a lot easier to do when the population is homogeneous and not diverse like America is. Then there is the student population disparity between the two countries as well. It doesn't mean America can't copy Finland's model, but it will be way harder to do so.

2 minutes ago, Stromboli1 said:

 

I've heard people rave about Finland and how they overhauled their educational system in 40 years. I think that it's a lot easier to do when the population is homogeneous and not diverse like America is. Then there is the student population disparity between the two countries as well. It doesn't mean America can't copy Finland's model, but it will be way harder to do so.

Finland has a tiny population, it's like a state or a big city. 

5 minutes ago, Cult Icon said:

Finland has a tiny population, it's like a state or a big city. 

America probably has 20 times or more amount of students Finland has. That's why I brought up the student population disparity.

13 hours ago, Cult Icon said:

Today:

 

this was interesting to watch:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OCabT_O0YSM