General Discussion

2339 replies · 17269 views

The Inner Sexiness's avatar
The Inner Sexiness
Posts: 50066
#1901
On 9/13/2018 at 8:17 PM, phenobarbie said:

 

No However it is a thread Joe created. Thanks for searching!!!

The Inner Sexiness's avatar
The Inner Sexiness
Posts: 50066
#1902
7 hours ago, Clauds said:

I agree, at this point it feels like she's asking for it. Half of what she says is attacking a model or a forum member.

 

As odd as it may sound I think she wants to get banned. It is like she is blatantly setting herself up. Perhaps it is some of twisted control thing that she feels the need to self-sabotage?  

Clauds's avatar
Clauds
Posts: 25637
#1903

I think she wants to be banned so she can trash talk about us  i fully expect her to come back with a different account after some time tho

The Inner Sexiness's avatar
The Inner Sexiness
Posts: 50066
#1904

^ She definitely has some major issues and I really hope she gets help for her own well being sake!

I see the lies in your eyes and yet I love you just the same's avatar
I see the lies in your eyes and yet I love you just the same
Posts: 25928
#1905

Should I contact Sanni? The few times I have interacted with her in PMs when she was behaving badly I think it went rather well (certainly not the worst experiences I have had on BZ whilst dealing with poorly behaved members).

The Inner Sexiness's avatar
The Inner Sexiness
Posts: 50066
#1906

^ Although I am not optimistic it would improve her behavior for good but it is worth a try. Better to exhaust all options before taking a more extreme measure like banning which is definitely where this is heading  

Clauds's avatar
Clauds
Posts: 25637
#1907

I think it may be a good idea too, maybe she'll see is not just like some of us that have a vendetta against her 

Just remember, Biden wasn't elected. He was installed's avatar
Just remember, Biden wasn't elected. He was installed
Posts: 59820
#1908
6 hours ago, SympathysSilhouette said:

Should I contact Sanni? The few times I have interacted with her in PMs when she was behaving badly I think it went rather well (certainly not the worst experiences I have had on BZ whilst dealing with poorly behaved members).

Honestly I don't think anything is going to change. She'll play nice nice with you, and then try and point the finger at us for "witch" hunting her even though we aren't the one's who are typing out her sentences, nor do I deal with her in any way, shape or form in fact I've told her I'm no longer dealing with her, but I'm still the bad one. After playing nice nice with you - she'll deflect, take zero responsibility for her actions. Then we'll see a good two weeks of her doing "fluff" posts and being nice, then Elsa will do something and she'll be back to slandering and passive aggressively taking shots at the staff, models and me in particular. This is Sanni's pattern.

 

I don't want to see her banned, I want to see her put on mod watch so we can carefully monitor her attitude problem. Hopefully she'll get a clearer idea of what's more acceptable to say, and what's not.

Camp Cupcake's avatar
Camp Cupcake
Posts: 10774
#1909

She's the proverbial horse and we keep waving the bucket of water in front of her. Maybe she'll like your water more then ours Sympathy.

Clauds's avatar
Clauds
Posts: 25637
#1910

Is there any chance that Souled-Out is (another) comeback of Lost_Soul? Her attitude is the same and she also only posts in Adriana's thread as well as the VS thread

The Inner Sexiness's avatar
The Inner Sexiness
Posts: 50066
#1911
2 hours ago, Clauds said:

Is there any chance that Souled-Out is (another) comeback of Lost_Soul? Her attitude is the same and she also only posts in Adriana's thread as well as the VS thread

 

I asked the same question awhile back. I was told it might be TKC (or whatever that member's name is) What exactly is he/she doing that  is causing issues?

Clauds's avatar
Clauds
Posts: 25637
#1912

She's the one that keeps bringing up Adriana's boyfriend all the time to whatever discussion, she's not being particularly problematic tho, I just have the huge feeling that it's the same person 

Clauds's avatar
Clauds
Posts: 25637
#1913

I'm trying to move a post from Yvonne Strahovski's thread but I can't? It gives me the option to hide or delete de post but not to move it to another thread. Is it normal? #sendhelp

Camp Cupcake's avatar
Camp Cupcake
Posts: 10774
#1914

Edited cause I have no idea what I'm talking about.. that's how you move a thread.

 

I just quoted the original post and put it in the correct thread so the op is still shown.

Clauds's avatar
Clauds
Posts: 25637
#1915

Ukrudt is spamming like there's no tomorrow o.o he/she sent like 150 "double post" posts, I'm deleting them right now but I think there will be more to get the post count to see the VS thread

Dont you know im loco's avatar
Dont you know im loco
Posts: 11003
#1916

I have unlocked the VSFS threads. This drives a lot of traffic to the site, so it should be available to all.Didnt realize it was locked down until I was logged out. 

 

Let me know if there is a compelling reason to be locked. 

Camp Cupcake's avatar
Camp Cupcake
Posts: 10774
#1917

It makes sense to unlock the thread to drive traffic up, I can't imagine how many more views you get when this time of year rolls around. I think the main concern is that with the Getty purge that went on earlier this year UHQ pictures are in very short supply and we seem to be one of the few forums that has access to pictures from Getty and Wireimage. Two of us have paid real money to get access to these pictures and they are constantly reposted elsewhere without credit to the forum, which in term doesn't generate more traffic for you.

 

I think if you left all the threads open except that the HQ image section where people had to contribute and thus come onto the forum more often to gain access it might in the long run generate more traffic. Especially if it were to become known that we do this every year, and if you contribute throughout the year you'll be able to view them immediately.

Dont you know im loco's avatar
Dont you know im loco
Posts: 11003
#1918
56 minutes ago, phenobarbie said:

It makes sense to unlock the thread to drive traffic up, I can't imagine how many more views you get when this time of year rolls around. I think the main concern is that with the Getty purge that went on earlier this year UHQ pictures are in very short supply and we seem to be one of the few forums that has access to pictures from Getty and Wireimage. Two of us have paid real money to get access to these pictures and they are constantly reposted elsewhere without credit to the forum, which in term doesn't generate more traffic for you.

 

I think if you left all the threads open except that the HQ image section where people had to contribute and thus come onto the forum more often to gain access it might in the long run generate more traffic. Especially if it were to become known that we do this every year, and if you contribute throughout the year you'll be able to view them immediately.

 

Keeping one thread private is ok with me, its all the threads thats the issue. Feel free to change the settings on the appropriate thread. The only HQ thread I saw was empty. 

 

Just remember, Biden wasn't elected. He was installed's avatar
Just remember, Biden wasn't elected. He was installed
Posts: 59820
#1919

Thanks Bossman! I set the HQ thread back to normal.

Camp Cupcake's avatar
Camp Cupcake
Posts: 10774
#1920

So I was looking over the rules/conventions section and I know we had briefly touched base on updating the rules for less ambiguity due to Saani's behavior and I was wondering if we could work towards condensing and updating not just the rules themselves but the entire section to make it more streamline and easier for members to navigate. Right now it's just a bunch of topics with a single post. I think that's because a lot of them were Pinned forum posts that Pinkcouture made for rule updates but it makes it seem a little haphazard when taken as a whole.

Page of 117