2585 replies · 37575 views



cute comics
http://viewcomic.com/ekho-v6-deep-south-2017/
http://viewcomic.com/reborn-001-2016/
http://viewcomic.com/colossi-002-2017/



-Nixon refuses to talk to the NYT for as long as he is President
-ditto for the LA Times, Newsweek, WP, Time
-Johnson also hated the NYTs, considering them a bunch of "kooks, communists, and conspirators" and could only find fault with him (no matter the success).
Nixon Tapes

One of my favorite montages in one of my favorite documentary films:
48:15-
"They're hauntingly beautiful grounds. White crosses row after row. "
55:45- 1:02:00

-considering reading this
"Two top domestic policy advisors to Senator Edward Kennedy offer an insider’s view of several remarkable years when Kennedy fought to preserve the Democratic mission against Newt Gingrich’s Contract with America and a Republican majority in both houses—a story that has special resonance now as a resurgent Republican right once again controls Congress.
In November 1994 the election swept a new breed of Republicans into control of the United States Congress. Led by Speaker Newt Gingrich, the Republicans were determined to enact a conservative agenda that would reshape American government. Had it not been for Ted Kennedy, they would have succeeded.
In 1994, after defending his Senate seat against challenger Mitt Romney, Kennedy came back to Washington to find Democrats, including President Clinton, demoralized and leaning toward “compromises” that would adopt much of the Republican agenda. Undaunted, Kennedy pressed the agenda he would have championed had his party held power. He rallied the Democrats. He reached across the aisle to craft and pass key progressive legislation. And he stopped the Gingrich revolution in its tracks."
https://www.amazon.com/Richard-E.-Neustadt/e/B001IXS230/ref=dp_byline_cont_book_1

my updated model list
any similarities?


Imgbox closing will end my hundreds of junkyard galleries;
<___base_url___>/topic/44606-cult-icons-junkyard/?page=42&do=embed&comment=4345341&embedComment=4345341&embedDo=findComment#comment-4345341

I was downloading missed out posts because of this and found that imagebam is down now, but seems it's not it's very end yet

^
I'm spending some time to look at my junkyard before the 6/30 deadline


About my Grandfather:
My grandfather was taken off life support and died a few hours later. He was 90.
Thanks for your prior messages guys

On 7/5/2017 at 6:52 PM, Cult Icon said:
About my Grandfather:
Spoiler
Hide contents
My grandfather was taken off life support and died a few hours later. He was 90.
Thanks for your prior messages guys
My sincere condolences Cult.

18 hours ago, CandleVixen said:My sincere condolences Cult.
Thanks

Interesting video about a great director:

My review of Dunkirk:
"
<___base_url___>/topic/62998-dunkirk-2017/?page=2&do=embed
I saw the movie over the weekend. The movie is all activity and action with limited dialogue. It's basically a series of crises and disasters strung together. The director focuses on the traumatic experiences of the men involved and how they confront them. It's very impressive, unique, and overwhelming but not really a historical film. Dunkirk is just a convenient setting. The film succeeds in creating a high level of tension and fear.
The Germans in the film are barely visible boogymen/monsters. A couple HE-111 medium bombers and numerous, scattered ME-109 fighters and Stuka dive bombers. There is an invisible U-boat that torpedos ships.
This film is a 5 out of 5 movie. My personal enjoyment of the film was more like 4 out of 5. The film has almost no character development and focuses entirely on POV of different individuals/groups (1. A solitary Ace Spitfire pilot. 2. A foot soldier on route to Britain 3. A civilian boat that is ordered to help transport personnel 4. A british evacuation commander). The talents of the big name British actors are kind of wasted in a way.
As a technical achievement it is a 5 out of 5 and imho will be a Best Picture contender and will win a bunch of other rewards. It has very little CGI that is obvious and the trailers don't do the film justice as it omits lots of poignant imagery. It's a very stimulating visual and auditory experience so it really should be seen in theaters. I would need to watch it a second time to catch everything that I missed.
The ships, aircraft, and equipment depicted in the film appear to be entirely real. The props are particularly good and so are the vistas. I especially like how the British soldiers were all skinny men (typical of the 1940s). A minor limitation however, is that since Nolan used real props he was limited in how much he could depict at once. (eg. it doesn't make sense that there are only 3 Spitfires in the whole film, or how the Luftwaffe anti-shipping sorties are in trios( 1 HE-111 with 2 ME-109 as escorts). But this filed using the real thing!
I like how he used real British destroyers and flipped them over at sea. The takes of what happens to the men inside of a ship that's being torpedoed is particularly impressive and surpasses what was achieved before (in films like Pearl Harbor or Das Boot). "
