Member Management

^ So we will count your Guys section mod vote for quetzales and the no vote for general mod---is that correct?

^ So we will count your Guys section mod vote for quetzales and the no vote for general mod---is that correct?

Yes.

The votes are in! We are in general agreement with Katchitup as a general mod Not sure do we want to check her account before inviting her to join the staff. Or we could bypass the account check and just go ahead & ask her would she like to join the staff?

The second person with the most votes is quetzales. I checked his posts & account already---everything looks fine. I am going to contact him to inquire about his interest. Thanks everyone for your votes & input (Y)

quetzales = 2 - PC, Michael*
Phenobarbie  = (2) - Pretty, Joe
Katchiup = 2 - Pretty, SS
donbot = 1 - SS
tzdon = 2 - PC, Joe

Based on the votes these the staff members we are excusing:

Berno = 3
Lady Fatale = 3
persuazn = 3
Qball = 3
Ronin = 3

On The Fence

ganymede30324 = 2
JoeKnight = 2
Kevork89 = 1
Carmelita = 1

With Kevork89 I was thinking we should PM him to ask whether he still wants to be on the staff. If he does he needs to step it up a bit

Aren't we missing some voters?

^ I forgot Joe's votes from before Monday so I added them in Does it look correct to you now?

Katchiup is the only one the majority of us agreed with as a general mod. We also need a mod for the Guys Section (the main point of why we are doing this in the first place), and quetzales is the one who had votes and no objections.

^ I forgot Joe's votes from before Monday so I added them in Does it look correct to you now?

 

Katchiup is the only one the majority of us agreed with as a general mod. We also need a mod for the Guys Section (the main point of why we are doing this in the first place), and quetzales is the one who had votes and no objections.

I just had the impression that more people had nominated than had voted.

^ We did have more nominees but the ones I posted were the ones the staff voted for, valid/viable or not.

I contacted quetzales already but not Kat b/c I am not sure do we want to check her account first. What do you think?

^ I thought Maddog already said no to Pheno

I did indeed. I think we can reconsider Pheno down the road but for now I dont believe its a good option as too many people will have issues with it. 

So, when do we give them the good news?

Heard back from Kat earlier today. The mods already got the news. Working on a PM to set them up. I will probably do it from work tomorrow afternoon

Awesome, looking forward to it.

I know I've brought this up in the past, but something is up with these two.

TexasLongHorn2013

&
 
BAGGOT
 
 
They follow a very similar pattern in that they love the same people, speak fanatically about their perfection and tend to follow each other very closely in posting.
Texas posts then Baggot follows within the hour... which is a serious LMS/LU - m.o

I think this is a case of them being very careful, and to remove them we either need to go with our guts, or Boss Man has to make the call to boot em.

-------

Dave is also seeing it.

Sent 27 March 2014 - 09:32 PM

Banned Staz L for claiming to be Nastassia Lindes.

http://www.bellazon....ndes/?p=3379951
http://www.bellazon....ndes/?p=3395683
http://www.bellazon....ndes/?p=3395726

217.68.116.150
ISP: TDC AS
Services: Confirmed proxy server
Type: N/A
Assignment: Static IP
Bergen, Norway

Outstanding

 

I know I've brought this up in the past, but something is up with these two.

TexasLongHorn2013

&

 

BAGGOT

 

 

They follow a very similar pattern in that they love the same people, speak fanatically about their perfection and tend to follow each other very closely in posting.

Texas posts then Baggot follows within the hour... which is a serious LMS/LU - m.o

 

I think this is a case of them being very careful, and to remove them we either need to go with our guts, or Boss Man has to make the call to boot em.

 

-------

Dave is also seeing it.

ILUVBarbaraPalvin (IP: 107.139.17.140 )

Sent 27 March 2014 - 09:32 PM

Hmmm, now I'm really seeing how BAGGOT, Texas and redxv are always leap frogging each others posts and at times I think BAGGOT is Texas with how similar their posts look in structure

 

I checked a few of redxv's IPs and here is what I found. I colored coded the ones that are connected:

208.54.87.213 (used 7 times; last used: 4/9/14 @ 5:17PM)

ISP: T-Mobile USA

Services: None detected

Type: Wireless Broadband

Assignment: Static IP

Newark, NJ

Shares IP With: fashion wiz

172.56.37.213 (used 7 times; last used: 4/8/14 @ 2:11PM)

ISP: T-Mobile USA

Services: None detected

Type: Wireless Broadband

Assignment: Static IP

Jersey City , NJ

173.56.41.63 (used 7 times; last used: 4/3/14 @ 9:46PM)

ISP: Verizon FiOS

Services: None detected

Type: Broadband

Assignment: Dynamic IP

Staten Island , NY

205.188.116.9 (used 1 time; last used: 2/1/14 @ 10:52PM)

ISP: America Online

Services: Suspected proxy server

Type: Dial-up

Assignment: Static IP

USA

64.12.117.13 (used 1 time; last used: 12/20/13 @ 10:57PM)

ISP: America Online

Services: Confirmed proxy server

Type: Dial-up

Assignment: Static IP

USA

107.57.175.250 (used 1 time; last used: 11/18/13 @ 4:48PM)

ISP: Sprint PCS

Services: None detected

Type: Wireless Broadband

Assignment: Static IP

Bayonne, NJ

75.94.120.112 (used 4 times; last used: 9/30/13 @ 2:54PM)

ISP: Clear Wireless

Services: Likely mail server

Type: Wireless Broadband

Assignment: Static IP

Jersey City, NJ

50.14.55.14 (used 3 times; last used: 5/20/13 @ 2:42PM)

ISP: Clear Wireless

Services: Likely mail server

Type: Wireless Broadband

Assignment: Static IP

Jersey City, NJ

98.116.142.116 (Registered with this IP on 2/28/05; used 2 times; last used: 2/5/12 @ 4:15PM)

ISP: Verizon FiOS

Services: None detected

Type: Broadband

Assignment: Static IP

Staten Island , NY

I could re-look into TLH and BAGGOT's accounts later if you like, or would it be better if we waited for MD like you suggested?

^ I think we have enough evidence to ban redvx. Pretty has a better understanding of IP address specifics so maybe she has some input :notsure: If there are no objections I am going ahead to ban him/her.

I will wait on what MD has to says about TLH and BAGGOT. TLH will probably be gone soon anyways so I guess the only person in question is BAGGOT.

What do the rest of you think?

I have no objections hun. The amount of IP proxies they've been hiding behind is ridiculous at  best. There's simply no need for it unless you're trying to hide who you are.

I think its the same person . 

I'm giving Dannicullen an official warning and placing her on temp mod watch.

I've been sent a least 9 different double threads she's made which is not only ridiculous, it's LAZY. Doesn't take more then 3 seconds to do a search to see if the model already has a thread. DC has repetdablity in the past tried to have us delete original threads just so she can make a new thread and take credit for the find. and I've had enough.

The potato is strong in DC.

IP ban for:

energizer358 (IP: 172.56.37.237)